Laserfiche WebLink
-JT- ' ■ # <br />re likely incorrect, <br />\f occurs in flatter <br />survey overlay onto <br />6% to 18% slopes, not <br />n Diagram from Soil <br />ing at the time of <br />1 unless unusual site <br />t presumes that it is <br />cated on a five-acre <br />buildable acres have <br />on the property. <br />would recommend that <br />iltant for Lots 2 and <br />» of the property are <br />:iate at this time to <br />table mound sites are <br />rk with applicant's <br />orings required. <br />development in the <br />uture road access to <br />ncur that, since the <br />he maximum five acre <br />idards no future road <br />>f Conservation and <br />3ts 2 and 3, and an <br />length of Painter's <br />ird 10 ’ perimeter and <br />[, as well as similar <br />e.v■ <br />■ <br />■ %1 <br />▼Vi <br />v^' <br />Eg-'Mmmm <br />Zoning File 11330 <br />September 13, 1988 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />B) Bn^^dway Dedication;: <br />The proposed plat indicates 33' of right-of-way will be dedicated to <br />the City for Townline Road right-of-way. <br />P) Park Fees; <br />Discussi* <br />This proposed subdivision appears to have been well thought <br />1. Does the developer propose any permanent signage or monuments at <br />the entry to the subdivision? <br />2. Are there any specific grading proposals for berms, etc. that are <br />not shown on the preliminary plat drawings? <br />TWO questions staff will address at the meeting after discussions with <br />the City Engineers <br />1. With the minimal likelyhood that the City would t>ke this over as <br />a public road in the foreseeable future, is the island in the private <br />road entry a cause for concern? <br />■».. «. Ci« 1.— •« <br />1*1 ‘ nr.«iy «> »«“« <br />at the Creek? <br />The Public works Director has indicated this proposal will not create <br />a need for any upgrading of Townline Road. <br />I <br />-r<' <br />.i ■ i <br />Zoning <br />Septemb <br />Page 5 <br />Staff R <br />1. <br />8