Laserfiche WebLink
.-•■Tv'm <br />r the height of the <br />♦Jill <br />19S8) showing <br />way. After <br />6, l98Sfrom J <br />t but rather simplify <br />offl within the street <br />I and relocation of <br />rianoe procedure. In <br />"according to Orono <br />ie 6* high <br />It to the right-of- <br />sewer line in the <br />iance, the monument <br />^ords they are <br />be 3.3'tali. In <br />9nx to the right-of- <br />led it as stating if <br />ITS, utilities, etc... <br />or structural <br />le more secure than <br />operty it also puts <br />wing the City ’s <br />nsequently closer to <br />i<ren down <br />ns the height of the <br />posed monuments <br />ily requires a <br />and the phrase in <br />ad it to mean: in a <br />1 of the letters 1 <br />igulations and my <br />property. The tone <br />le pillars more so <br />ior to proceeding <br />B never offered. <br />1 would not <br />}lumns. <br />% <br />p- <br />.1. <br />•> <br />•Hi' <br />1 <br />I? <br />•v.' <br />-.1 <br />Sii,-p—- <br />I thought 1 was following the tetter of the law. For several months we have had open <br />communication about revising the design, the location of the pillars, the soil stability in <br />that area, the sewer lines adjacent to the pillars, etc 1 thought that by moving back onto <br />private property 1 resolved all of the concerns the Qty originally had in reference to <br />these new brick entry monuments. <br />Now (after the fact) while discussing this issue in a phone call with Jeanne Mabusth, she <br />mentiooed that this entry monument issue is becoming increasingly more common. She <br />also stated that many of the variances applied for. for these entry monuments, are after <br />the fact. This leads me to believe that 1 am not alone in my Interpretation of the eiisting <br />ordinances and perhaps more attenuon should be given to clarifying the language In your <br />ordinances for these particular site elements. <br />.> *•% <br />Hardship and Unusual Property Conditions #1332 Hr <br />The practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of the regulations is that for <br />several months out of the year (the winter) 42** high entry monuments could conceivably <br />be under snow and not visible. <br />By placing these address pillars back on private property 1 felt the 3* 6" height was <br />needed for visibility. This portion of Ferndale Road is very dark at night Fdr safety and <br />to adequately light the driv -way as well as the house numbers, the 3' b** height was <br />decided u <br />K' <br />'' ‘ ^ Xf' Okf* , <br />4’ . < <br />■ ■ <br />1 :■ <br />♦ ^ <br />v iii <br />■»v <br />Arteka <br />Kevin K <br />5800 Ba <br />Minneto <br />Dear Ke <br />Recent] <br />Road We: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Accord! <br />surface <br />right-of <br />they ca] <br />sanitary <br />In regal <br />you dis <br />Resource <br />If you a <br />the norm <br />that thi <br />If you h <br />7357. <br />JRG/pp 1C <br />cc: Jeanr <br />BUILDING a ZONING <br />ASSESSING