Laserfiche WebLink
ifc: :'^ <br />'•9 <br />•I &dif <br />tI m <br />it <br />< <br />I <br />i: <br />i; <br />- . v;5 <br />^Rrl-'l;- ■ ■ H <br />^mm <br />®i <br />Ks;i'';- <br />Vv:.rV ; - .:-^ <br />Wm <br />■ '■ ■•' ^ - S ■ ■■ <br />» >•; •. ■■ .-■■ ■ <br />./■.>•' r-, <br />V. ■:;• -•>•-■-. •■'.•: •■ ■mrnm <br />me - <br />mm <br />W^'-i 'J <br />#s <br />hIIi ■:a <br />Tds Planning Conmission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Dates <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />September 15, 1988 <br />Subject: #1332 Marcelo Gunucio, 980 PerndaXe Road Heat <br />After-the-Pact Variances - Public Hearing <br />Application - height variance for driveway entry pillars in <br />pillaL?^ height, in conjunction with setback variance for such <br />Zoning District - LR-IA <br />Mat of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit C - <br />Exhibit D - <br />Exhibit E - <br />Exhibit P - <br />Exhibit G - <br />Exhibit H - <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Letter of Request & Hardship Statement <br />Survey <br />John Gerhardson's Letter of 1/6/88 <br />Gaffron's Letter of 1/25/88 <br />Plan & Elevation Views of Pillars <br />Pertinent Code Sections - <br />A) Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (O- Ths* ^ <br />to^be*c^sid maximum 3%* height ”limitation <br />pillars is |®6' reoulr?n"'®"°~1°‘’^"^ Existing height of <br />lUhtlnq fixture or o^ht*PPli«nt notes that no <br />“4’-" <br />Ii9htln9°iS n«Msaa^! Sloba if thay datarnlna additional dctveway <br />?! Subdivision 5 (B): Since the pillars exceed 3'6* <br />f?ont leVback® fro°m t1,e°™“KV’' required to meet the minimi 5^ <br />required! The f^erino ^^^ht-of-way, hence a setback variance is <br />the front lot line. ^ ^ Hars are wxthin the property but abutting <br />Discussion - <br />pillars“with*’!tl« urlor ‘'to ^wo occasslons, discussed these <br />discussions rl^ulteTfn e l er?“ construction. In both Instances, those <br />position on the men-.r *'"c® architect confirming the City's <br />statements Somehw, the architect managed to misinterpret the <br />inco„ec\^ pVe‘r;;i:- rot/t'Jfe a^-fi-on/ o^/^^Vh^^^l^in^nrfr ”o “n^? <br />•i v* <br />;k' <br />r? <br />«vm- <br />wms <br />M- <br />M: <br />iif'S <br />r <br />I /;. vJ0 <br />w <br />Zoning <br />Septern] <br />Page 2 <br />T1 <br />Additi <br />travel <br />maintez <br />T1 <br />purpos <br />them, <br />for emc <br />Staff c <br />St <br />pillar <br />Perndal <br />A) <br />ro <br />fr <br />B) <br />cl <br />pr <br />C) <br />sa <br />Ap] <br />1. <br />fi: <br />dl; <br />cr< <br />'p < <br />^ ..