Laserfiche WebLink
•»-Vii^ I <br />B w <br />(?i <br />EETING, BUT AS I AM <br />T, I WILL NOT BE ABLE <br />TART TIME. I HOPE THAT <br />GHBOR, FOR SITTING IN <br />KEISER IS THE PERSON <br />OTHER THAN MYSELF OF <br />lAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO <br />H THE COMPLETION OF <br />HGINAL IDEA FOR THE <br />iY ME FOR MY FATHER. <br />ICOVERY HAS BEEN <br />H GOOD AND BAD DAYS. <br />ER THIS SPRING. HE <br />^ING AROUND HIM VERY <br />HE WOULD WATCH ABOUT <br />EL AND THEN CHANGE THE <br />=i HANDYMAN, I TRIED TO <br />_D HIM TO DESIGN A DECK <br />T 10 OR MORE DECKS FOR <br />IT DID SEEM TO FOCUS HIS <br />JT TO PURCHASE THE <br />R BROTHER, WE STARTED TO <br />INSPECTOR CAME BY AND <br />TED A STOP WORK ORDER. <br />URALLY STOPPED WORKED <br />CHANCE MET WITH THE <br />IT APPLICATION AND <br />D BEEN COMPLETED. IT <br />L SCALE PROJECT, THE <br />AN ACCURATE DIAGRAM <br />NG OUT ANY OTHER HARD <br />■ <br />«•••*! <br />PS <br />CITY^ qpc <br />DECK PERHIT <br />.4 ...^ ' i' - <br />■ ^W <br />WORK ORDER, I MAILED EVERYTHING THAT I HAD TO THE CITY. THE NEXT TIME THAT I <br />HEARD FROM ANYONE REGARDING THIS MATTER WAS THE JULY 22nd LETTER FROM LYLE <br />OMAN. <br />NEEDLESS TO BAY I WAS MORE THAN UPSET. I CALLED THE CITY AND THEY ADVISED ME <br />THAT THEY NEVER HAD RECEIVED MY ORGINAL SUBMISSION AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO <br />AGAIN FILE ALL OF THE NEEDED FORMS. WHAT HAPPENED TO MY ORIGNAL FILING STILL <br />STUMPS ME AS I NEVER RECEIVED IT BACK AND COULD ONLY ASSUME THAT IF I SENT IT <br />TO THE WRONG ADDRESS IT WOULD BE RETURNED. <br />AFTER AGAIN COMPLING ALL OF THE INFORAMTIDN WHICH YOU NEED, I HAND DELIVERED <br />THIS INFORMATION. IN MY EARLIER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION, I WAS ALSO INFORMED <br />OF THE tlSO.OO FILING CHARGE. THIS WAS NOT INCLUDED IN MY FIRST SUBMISSION <br />AND I BELIEVE THAT IS WHERE THE PROBLEM ACTUALLY AROSE REGARDING THE "LOST'' <br />FIRST SUBMISSION. <br />THAT BASICALLY BRINGS US UP TO DATE. THERE ARE ABOUT FIVE HOURS OF WORK LEFT <br />TO DO ON THIS PROJECT. THE PEOPLE LIVING ON CRYSTAL BAY ROAD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS <br />TO THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. CERTAINLY, A DECK FACING THE LAKE DOES NOT <br />INTERFER WITH ANY AETHETIC DESIGN WHICH THE CITY FATHERS MAY HAVE FOR THF LAKE <br />FRONT. IN FACT THERE ARE VERY FEW LAKE FRONT PROPERTIES IN THIS AREA WHICH DO <br />NOT HAVE AT LEAST A DECK EXPOSURE FACING THE LAKE. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A <br />LAND SURVEY I THINK THAT I HAVE COMPLETED ALL OF YOUR REQUIRED FORMS. I WOULD <br />HOPE THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME THAT PAYING *600 TO $G00 FOR A LAND SURVEY <br />FOR A FROJECT WHICH COSTS UNDER #600 TO COMF'LETE IS AN ONEROUS F’RICE TO F'AY FOR <br />SUCH A SIMPLE PROJECT AND THAT YOU WILL WAIVE THIS REQUIREMENT. LASTLY I <br />WOULD THINK THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME, A SLOTTED WOODEN DECK DOES NOT HAVE <br />MUCH OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL INPACT. IN FACT, 1 FAIL TO SEE WHEFv'E THERE IS ANY <br />MEASURABLE CHANGE ON THE RUNOFF PATTERNS OF MY PROPERTY DUE TO THIS NEW <br />EXPOSURE. <br />1 CERTAINLY HOPE THAT WE CAN PUT THIS SITUATION TO BED. I KNOW THAT THFRE <br />-‘-‘SI Bf MUCH WEIGHTIER PROBLEMS WHICH YOU SHOULD GO ON TO. MV SIMPLE DESIRE <br />is; to complete this project as soon I CAN AND BE ABLE TO ENJOY THE LIFESTYLE <br />WHICH THE LAKE PROVIDES THE RESIDENCE OF OUR AREA. <br />^ON W. PAPAS <br />^3369 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD <br />ORONO, MN 55391 <br />V'