Laserfiche WebLink
Ml III!' Ill*W. ^ <br />JULY 25, 1988 <br />CITY OF GRONO <br />P.O. BOX 66 <br />CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 <br />RE: BUILDING PERMIT <br />VARIANCE APPLICATION ir -I- /w <br />TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: <br />ENCLOSED THERE IS A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, TWO COPIES OF MY CONSTRUCTION <br />PLANS, A VARIANCE APPLICATION AND A SIGNED NON-OBJECTION LETTER FROM MY NEAREST <br />NEIGHBORS REGARDING THE PROPOSED WOODEN DECK ON THE FRONT OF MY PROPERTY. <br />THE MAJOR REASON I LIVE WHERE I DO IS THE ENJOYMENT WHICH THE VIEW OF LAKE <br />MINNETONKA PROVIDES ME. THE IDEA THAT I HAVE TO JUMP THROUGH ALL OF THESE <br />BUREAUCRATIC HOOPS SIMPLY TO PUT AN UNOBTRUSIVE DECK ON THE FRONT OF MY PREMISES <br />IS REPUGNANT TO ME. PER THE INFORMATIONAL PAGE ON YOUR VARIANCE APPLICATION, <br />THE HARDSHIP WHICH I MUST ENDURE IS ONE OF LACK OF SIMPLE COMMON SENSE. I <br />HAVE ENCLOSED SEVERAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF OTHER DECKS BUILT ON STRUCTURES ON MY <br />IMMEADIATE BLOCK WHICH DO NOT MEET YOUR ZONING REQUIREMENTS AS TO SETBACK <br />DISTANCES. I AM NOT INCLUDING THESE PHOTOGRAPHS SIMPLY TO SHOW YOU THAT OTHER <br />EXCEPTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE OR HAVE BEEN GRANDFATHERED INTO PLACE? RATHER, MY <br />INTENT IS SHOW YOU THAT DECK ON THE FRONT OF ONE’S PROPERTY IS MORE OF A MATTER <br />OF STANDARD AND ACCEPTED PRACTICE IN OUR LOCALITY. I WOULD COMPARE IT TO THE <br />OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENCE OF DOCK. IT EFFECTS THE "ORDERLY DEVELOPEMENT AND USE <br />OF THE LAND" AND EFFECTS ABOUT AS MUCH "HARDCOVER" AS A DOCK. <br />WITH THAT MINI-TIRADE OUT OF THE WAY, I WILL ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN MY CONSTRUCTION <br />PLANS. AS YOU WILL READILY SEE WHEN YOU LOOK OVER THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, I AM <br />NOT AN ARCHIECT BY TRADE. IN AN EFFORT TO CLEAR UP ANY QUESTIONS WHICH YOU MAY <br />HAVE I WILL INCLUDE A BRIEF NARATIVE REGARDING MY CONSTRUCTION PLANS. <br />THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF LUMBER WHICH WILL BE USED IN THIS PROJECT. WHEN THIS <br />PROJECT IS COMPLETED, THE NONVISABLE, SUPPORT, FRAMING MATERIAL WILL BE <br />CONSTRUCTION GRADE TREATED PONDEROSA PINE (HEREAFTER REFERED TO AS TREATED). <br />THE VISABLE OUTSIDE CASING AND THE DECKING ITSELF WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OUT OF <br />REDWOOD LUMBER (HEREAFTER REFERED TO AS REDWOOD). <br />THE FOUNDATION OF THIS DECK BUILT NEAREST THE EXSISTING DWELLING IS BUILT ON <br />8X12X18 CONCRETE BLOCKS. THERE ARE TWO 2X8X10 TREATED RUNfiERS (CUT TO LENGTH), <br />BOLTED WITH METAL BOLTS AND ANCHORS, WHICH FORM THE REAR HEADER. THE FRONT <br />HEADER IS ALSO CONSTRUCTED OUT OF TWO 2X8X10 TREATED RUNNERS, TIED TO A SERIES <br />OF FIVE 4X4 REDWOOD SUPPORT POSTS. THERE ARE 15, 10 FOOT, TREATED, 2X8 JOISTS <br />RUNNINGS BETWEEN THESE TWO HEADERS. EACH OF THESE JOISTS ARE CONECTED TO THE <br />HEADERS ON BOTH ENDS BY JOIST HANGERS. THESE JOISTS ARE SEPERATED BY 16 INCH <br />CENTERS. THE TWO OUTSIDE TREATED JOISTS ARE EACH FURTHER CONECTED ATTACHED TO <br />TWO 4X4 AND ONE 2X4 REDWOOD SUPPORT POSTS. <br />THE REMAINDER OF THE DECK IS VISABLE AND IS CONSTRUCTED WITH REDWOOD LUMBER. <br />THERE IS ON 2X4 SUPPORT POST ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DECK LOCATED NEXT TO THE <br />DWELLING. ON EACH OF THE 10 FOOT LENGTHS, THERE IS A 4X4 POST SITUATED FIVE <br />FEET FROM EITHER END AND ANOTHER 4X4 POST ON THE PORTION OF THE DECK LOCATED <br />ON THE FRONT CORNER 0*^ DECK, AWAY FROM THE DWELLING. CONECTED TO THE OUTSIDE <br />OF THESE SIX REDWOOD POSTS ARE TWO 2X6X10 REDWOOD BOARDS WHICH FORM THE OUTSIDE <br />PORTION OF THE TWO 10 FOOT SIDES. <br />BUILDU <br />THE FRC <br />4X4 REI <br />OF THE <br />4X4 REI <br />TO THE <br />WHICH 1^ <br />WILL F] <br />END OF <br />2X6 REE <br />THE P0£ <br />WHEREVE <br />WILL BE <br />THE DEC <br />FEET OF <br />THERE k <br />THE PEF <br />PICKETS <br />THESE U <br />AGAIN, <br />APPROVE <br />OTHER C <br />WORK-55 <br />CERE <br />JON W. <br />3369 CR <br />ORONO, <br />I