Laserfiche WebLink
-4igvi- <br />JLY 18, 1988 <br />with the following <br />and Hanson. Brown <br />staff: Building & <br />ling Administrator <br />Peterson was also <br />he location of the <br />) leave a 2+ acre <br />nd buildable lot. <br />listing house with <br />lommendation by the <br />nodate drainfield <br />:ant has agreed to <br />development. This <br />access from County <br />interior access be <br />diagram showing <br />perty owner to ^he <br />Derty could easily <br />property directly <br />a sewer system on <br />sure whether there <br />ive 2 acre lots in <br />Location to avoid <br />that a stipulation <br />road is developed. <br />>mitted and Cohen <br />it relates to a <br />ography would be <br />he has recently <br />ent possibilities <br />ipproach to the <br />y to the east and <br />ability of coming <br />t property. She <br />i into the present <br />n of 20 feet for <br />E the subdivision <br />:tion costs would <br />require usage of <br />n to say that he <br />V •• ■ ■ <br />■"'rf-VV?rv <br />MIBUTBS OP THE PLAHNIB6 COMMISSIOII XTIBG HELD JULY 18, 1988 <br />#1301 DAVID L. WHITE « FREDRICK C. WHITE>CONTINUED <br />concurred with Mr. Cohen's request for a topographic map. The PC has to be <br />sare that the development of this land is in line with the comprehensive <br />plan of the City. He felt it is important to limit access from County <br />Roads, especially 19. because that traffic will increase over time. <br />Commissioner Johnson agreed that a more comprehensive workup was needed as <br />to development alternatives for the property. <br />Kelley asked for further public comments, there were none. Johnson <br />questioned whether it was Hennepin County's position to limit access to the <br />County Roads involved as much as possible. Gaffron responded that although <br />they have not yet responded in this application, typically they would like <br />to limit as far as possible the number of accesses. It was moved by <br />Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table #1301 pending Applicant's further <br />consideration of a comprehensive development plan and submittal of e <br />topographical map, and review by the City as to the p<!'sition and cost of <br />the roadway. Motion, Ayes«€, Nays»0, Motion passed. <br />#1207 GBEE 8 CATHERIEB SCAHLOH <br />2815 CASCO POIET ROAD <br />COEDZTIORAL USE PERMIT ft VARIAHCB <br />THIRD REVIEW <br />Gene and Catherine Scanlon were present for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Applicants were seeking <br />the replacement of structures that were damaged in the storm of July 23, <br />1987. The specific structures involve a lake shore deck, access stairs and <br />a 7* X 7' storage shed. Applicants now propose placing the storage shed <br />underneath the existing or proposed deck, which will allow for a reduction <br />in the hardcover from what was there prior to the storm. The total <br />hardcover for the proposed deck is 165 sq. ft. The plans have beer <br />reviewed by the building inspector. <br />Commissioner Kelley asked what the 165 ft. included. Mabusth stated <br />it includes just the decking, and not the 149 sq. ft. of access stairs. <br />Kelley questioned recommendation #2 regarding plantings. Mabusth replied <br />that this procedure is very consistent with what they are now asking of all <br />persons who replace retaining walls in lakeshore yards. She noted that the <br />Applicants have volunteered to reduce hardcover within the 75~250* setback <br />area. Hanson commended the Applicants on making every effort to work or <br />this. Mabusth added that the Scanlons are going directly to the Council or. <br />this. <br />In regard to the date the hardcover removals are to take place, Hansor <br />asked Applicants for a date they felt was realistic. Applicants replied <br />next Spring, and June 30, 1989, was agreed upon. The specific hardships <br />that apply in this particular variance are the extreme slope of the land <br />and the necessary work required to stabilize that area after the storm. <br />Johnson stated that he did not think this variance was consistent with <br />the *-75' policies in that there is a retaining wall, stairs, storage <br />structure and deck all within 25' of the Lake. It was moved by Hanson, <br />seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of #1207, Gene & Catherine