09-19-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ar needs to be an our property, the woods and r. Rebers should bility insurance damages to h Brown Road. ress. However we rono is progress, esidential to e community of sidential property ,'."!v V? •4a Ty-' ...’.■ r-' p'.if • |,;7-ma ' I Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael t. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Dates September 15, 1988 Subjects #1301 Fredrick White, 180 North Shore Drive West - Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review - Continuation of Public Hearing Application - The applicant has revised his request to exclude the second building lot from consideration at this time, and has revised the lot lines for the parcel to contain the existing house. Zoning District ~ RR-IB List o£ Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Exhibit G Exhibit H Notice of Planning Commission Action 7/21/88 Glenn Cook's Letter of 7/15/88 Hennepin County Department of Transportation's Letter 7/27/88 Staff's Sketch of Potential Access Locations Conceptual Area Development Plan Based on Feasible Access Locations Memo & Exhibits 7/14/88 Revised Preliminary Plat Drawing Planning Commission Minutes of 7/18/88 Discussion - The applicant has revised his proposal, as noted above, to include creation of just a separate 2+ acre lot to contain the existing house. The remaining parcel could then be designated as either a second lot or as an outlot. * Note that designation as an outlot would be appropriate if the City's intent is to not allow a separate house to be constructed on the large parcel without further subdivision. The reverse option, to make the large parcel Lot 2, would allow a single residence to be built without an additional subdivision, and would have potential significant effect on how a future subdivision might occur. The applicant states that his intent is to complete this initial one- lot subdivision now, then perhaps come back later with a proposal to divide off a second lot. Applicant notes that he has interested parties looking at the large parcel for possible development. p’»■?! i: ■V ifei: I •v zoning File September 1 Page 2 of 4 Note a meeting, tl received in this time. Access Site The ap the potentd County reg there is o Bayside Roa access loc requirement those two I necessary northerly 19/County I would invo] Those other acces developmex and the otl for the W1 existing d would not road. Given Developmen ne*‘:^hr- -»rin« It ap in the ar< require fu of the par