Laserfiche WebLink
' '1 Pli»s ^SSS mSBsinatiefigign. <br />ks <br />ng <br />Df <br />le <br />2 <br />5d <br />3S <br />ar <br />be <br />a <br />:e <br />>n <br />le <br />fie <br />6# <br />I S <br />be <br />be <br />Ls <br />le <br />3r <br />n. <br />Df <br />fi. <br />:¥.*0-;.v - / :■:.■• ^. V1^^^: ■:'^' <br />' -.W: <br />^;=;;. f;^-■ -U ' : #; rtV ;V;:,.>saSia^^myyy-y^^^y&mymV..-: •.. . • r- .S: ■ ?-V :v -■■.I---'MINUTES OP THE PIAIIMIIIG COMMISSION MBBTlNG HELD NOVEMBER 16, 19S7• |>lfl218 THE ESTATE OF ROTH SMITH CONTIHHanson noted that he has a personal interest in this property but no financial interest, therefore felt there was no problem with voting on this application.m..-■p-y Brown noted that several of the accessory structures on the property are in a state of disrepair and asked how the City could deal with that.Mabusth stated that the condition of the accessory structure are not related to the subdivision, hoewever, <br />the City can inspect the structures and consider them <br />under separate hazardous buildings proceedings. <br />There were no comnents from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Johnson, to table <br />this application pending additional information per <br />staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*1104 GREGG PERL <br />309 MBSTLAKE STREET <br />VARIAHCHS <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:14-7:22 <br />Gregg Perl was present for this matter. <br />Gaffron explained the request for rear and side setback <br />variances and height variance to construct an addition <br />to existing residence. Applicant requests a setback <br />variance for the garage to be located 2' from the house <br />structure, which staff recommends should be denied and <br />structures should be attached for safety reasons. <br />Regarding the height variance, he explained that a <br />variance would not be required if the peak did not have <br />open space, however because the peak is open space with <br />window, a variance is required. Regarding the septic <br />system, applicant plans an interim repair of the system <br />until it is known whether City sewer will come in in the <br />next few years. If sewer does not come through, a mound <br />system is anticipated with no alternate site tested to <br />date. Staff finds no problem with the proposed interim <br />repair. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Johnson, to <br />recommend approval of the variances per staff <br />recommendation including attaching the garage to house <br />structure. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />• . ... . . •••*. -.- V :mm:y: i