02-16-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

9Ct to project). After preparing the area ered by removing debris and leveling ^ id, measure area and cut fabric to size, A fabric back onto area to be covered. / side must be up. abric from the back to the point where lay at the base of the plant. Cut a dr* , minimum of six inches in diameter to ound the plant stem. n more than one fabric section is used, ap them by at least three inches.mmr - ents (fuzz) to be putted from the fabric structure, is more pronounced with fabric placed on as. ck SGveral times a year to make sure the fabric ivered by the ground cover. Ultraviolet rays in ight are harmful to the fabric, and prolonged ex- jre will cause deterioration. LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR: ■ •, ■ • ■ ■ <\ m m CU8 11/84 m • ;■ -JiY" * >;:V;Y.vv-; V et we wPlanning Coimaission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonJeanne A. Mabusth, Building s Zoning Administrator February 9, 1988Subjects #1246 Walter White, 1100 Old Crystal Bay Road South *■ Preliminary Subdivision (Class III) - Public HearingZoning District - RK-IB Total Area - 25.1 acres Dry Land - 11.2 acres (8.7 acres contiguous, divided by wetlands within Lot 2) Wet Land - 13.9 acres 2.5 acres contlgous List of Exhibits Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit P Application Property Owners List Plat Map Staff Sketch of Sewer Line Resolution for Breckenridge Plat Preliminary Plat The Whites propose a two lot division of their 25+ acre homestead. Lot 1, as proposed, contains the required 2 acres of dry land. All existing structures meet the required setbacks from the newly proposed lot line. A residence can be developed on Lot 1 without the need for setback variances. The applicant has asked that access to Lot 1 be via the existing drivewway serving the house on Lot 2. Staff has no problem with this, in fact there would be no t;ecd to grant the usual variance for Lot 1 because the property clearly has 200' of access along the public right-of-way. Owner of Lot 2 will have to grant an access easement in favor of Lot 1. The County will be asked to comment on the shared use of the existing access. Staff will report at the meeting. The wetlands shall be described as drainage easements on the final plat, describing the wetland areas with angles and bearings. The City will ask for the customary flowage and conservation easement over the wetland areas. Note that the property line goes to the center line of County Road 84. The City will ask that the additional 33' of right-of-way be dedicated to the County for road use purposes. Also note, the existing sewer line is located close to the mid-line of the County road. There appears no need to acquire additional easements for the sewer line. The surveyor will have to confirm that Lot 2, as proposed, still meets the required 2 acres of dry contiguous, exclusive of the additional dedication of right-of-way for the County road. =^•v -.Tr Vv -A.V-. 0 . : ^ ri; •. • .... 1.: - ;f *. '. *'■• .* . ■ •; • ^ ; _ ;■■■ -p.- " JiiP • ■. ym ■‘myym WiMmM ■ VV-..-.- YV ymmm mmmm:j-l:; • ■J-m' •V •■••!■ •• y.,-. •/-i wmmmm ■ -v. >f.- •. •; ■ ■ ' 4 ":4. -yM;: . g a:- ^ y ■: 'M'-'iiifcay i ' ; -y ■ .c.' mmmmmmmmmm m m