Laserfiche WebLink
itrator <br />in 1985, <br />setback. <br />3cover in the 0*» <br />which partially <br />ones. Because of <br />Lowing certain c£ <br />aightly revised <br />pproximately 51* <br />existing house is <br />ly all of the pre- <br />.e fabric. A site <br />that the permeable <br />I into Mie ground, <br />with tabric under <br />Sofiing file 11 111 <br />11, 19tt <br />fsag# f of I <br />If tfc« CovncI 1 contiaues to iieat eseb f©cklwitfe/^roeeble fabric aa <br />hardcover, the percentaoea are as followat <br />a* - 21.it 11208 sq. ft.I <br />75* -250*1 21.21 <2191 aq. ft. I <br />1. Tlia proposed addition ancroachaa approalaately 10* additional <br />diatanca oaat tha avarsga lakaahore setback line. Bowavar, duei to <br />topofrsphf and alta layoai, bo lake viewa anloyad by altber adjacent <br />pf^rty owner will be decreased due to the proposed ^ItSon. <br />4, The applicants have qiven no written justlfIcetlon or MrdsMp lor <br />fhelr request to expatid the house toward the **ka. ?*)**^^*^*! <br />that floor layout of the house, topoqrs|d»y genarelly eloping *1*" <br />sttbstsntiel nstursl screening elong the we»t leleshore. night eii oe <br />suggested by the ^,pilcsnts es juetificetlon for the request. <br />5. The V rrent proposal would require e revision to the <br />hardcover ns previously approved for this property, eince the exJeting <br />house, proposed addition end Iskeshore deck end eteire in total conprise s <br />Isruer square footeci of pernenent structural hardcover then was previously <br />th. 0--7J' tb. tb.t «-• <br />used, and which nay still be valid, is »hst the bulk of <br />hits the existing house end propoved addition generally flows or can be <br />directed to flow eastward through the front yard axes. <br />Dl»:USSIO|it <br />As of this writing, applicants were out of town and <br />reachad for diacusalon of the project. The <br />review of this property wee quite rigorous, and <br />Included e letter fron that previous application which states their <br />position regarding hardcover. <br />To d.t., the .pplic.nt. h.v. co.plled with tli» l.tt.t end Int.nt of <br />th. 1985 v.ri.nce ipprovel. City St.ff contlnu. to eupport the conc.^ <br />that land.cap. bode underlain by p.ri>..bl., gTOtechnlcal ***>«^‘' <br />will »e.t th. intent of th. h.rdcov.r ordinance ‘V P*? P*J “•“‘J <br />maintained. The applicant is advised that the current C ^ under <br />taken a conservative position on th© use of permeable K.irftf'rtver <br />l.ndac.po areas, and generally continue# to treat auch area# aa hardcover, <br />because it is virtually i.poe.ible for C*ty Staff to enforce th <br />maintenance of those areas ss non-hardcover. <br />Working under the assumption that the applicants* landscape areas with <br />fabric are not hardcover, the current proposal results if* an increase in <br />hardcover In the 0*-75* tone over what was previously - <br />Notwithstandi*>g the hardcover issue, the proposal does ask for additional <br />encroachment n*iar the lake on the west side, within the 0 - . . <br />City has generally encouraged property owners in similar situations t