07-18-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

\ i TotTxomi omtmt Plaftniim Comission CMiiman K«ll«y Orono Planning CoMiMion Mmbars City Administrator BarnhardaonJaanna A. Habaath, Building ( toning Administrator July 15, 1988 Snbjacts #1291 Alfrad Ivaraon 2135 Caaco Point load - lafarrad Bact to tha Planning Cossaiission toy Staff List of BzliiMta Sxhibit 1 - Exhibit 2 - Exhibit 3 - Exhibit 4 > Exhibit 5 - Exhibit 6 • Exhibit 7 - Exhibit 8 - valaon Lattar 8/15/88 Total Rardcoaar to ba iMwvad with latriiad Iag>rovaM8nt Plan Original Pront/Street Elevation laviaad Street Blavaticm Lakeside Elevation Side Elevation (Garage) Side Elevation Gaffron Sketch and Fact Sheet for Determination of Final Grade Elevation as Palates to Lower Floor - Used to Determine where Total Height of the Structure is to be Measured from. In preparing for the Council meeting of July lith# the reviewing staff noted the possible need for a height variance, review Exhibit 3. The second story addition would appear to be a loft area that would have required the total height of the structure to be included in the height measurement. Early calculations revealed a possible need for a height variance. In addition, the second story deck was found to encroach Into the yard area approximately 17* where originally staff had advised that the deck was completely located over the existing grade level deck. Once again, the hardcover calculations %rauld have to be rechacked to include the second story deck as it became an encroachment by exceeding a 1-1/2* width at 4*. Staff includes overhangs that exceed a 1-1/2* width with all hardcover calculations. Staff immediately advised the applicant of the need to pull the variance request off tha Council agenda until staff was able to obtain additional information from the applicant*s consultants. At the meeting, the consultant or building representative submitted revised plans, review Exhibits 4, 5, 6, and 7. (The contractor stated that these plans had been submitted to the City. Staff has checked with the clerical person who receives all submissions of new suiterials and the clerk advised that the only second submittals from Randall Construction were the amended exhibits prepared for the additional hardcover removal prepared for the Council meeting for July 11th.) Review Exhibits 4 and 9, the street elevation and the cross section of the three floors. Staff was able to confirm there was no loft and that the wlndow-llke looking features were in reality, stucco sections/ornamental at the top of the roof. Review Exhibit 8. Gaffron has prepared a sketch and table showing the calculations to determine the exposure of the lower elevation. If more than 50% of the lower floor was exposed, the measurement of the height of ^‘4 4# % ^ - ' m-- j