07-18-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I !i m * * ^ I ^r r<ming film «13Q7 Page 2 of 2Pmrlmw BKhibits C and D. not axcaad KS a.f. of The apiilicanta plana no« ahov a deck that dcaa a. The Btaira have the appropriate naeber of *^^**^* within the 12 foot Intervala. Applicant haa reduced the eaoent of additional hardcover by eeploying the gravel area of the retaining wall landlnga r«julrlng only one deck atalr 3* «• by 3* 3». in additlcait reviev Exhibit F, the building Inspector has reviewed the revised plana subailtted by the applicant and has approved thee finding that they sMet all requirenenta of the state building code. Aa the Majority of the Planning CoMMission have conceptually approved the proposed reconstruction of a dock, access stair, and shed within the •canlona lakeahore yard, staff will repeat somo of the suggested findings froH an original staff aiewo dated June 1, 1PS8 if application was to be approved. A. The applicant haa reduced hardcover with the new proposal for the inproveaents within the lakeahore yard ai^ within the 75-250* setback B. The existing structures were renoved aa a result of a severe atom that eroded the lakeahore bank and had nothing to do with the laproper maintenance of the subject structures. C. There have been no substantial changes in the code since 1575 when the LR districts and lakeahore standards were established. D. The City had approved siailar variances for the property in1970. rrj B. The steep topography requires special consideration for the residents of the property. F. The applicant’s physical lialtations as documented by his personal physician's report would prevent his full enjoyment of his lakeahore property if the deck and shed were not restored to lakeahore yard. The following conditions are also recoanended with the approval of this application: 1. Run-off from the roof of the shed must be directed away froa the grade level of the retaining wall and drained to a drainage structure already within the retaining wall substructure or via an Independent drainage tile. This will prevent any undermining of the existing retaining wall structure. 2. Plantings must be provided adjacent to each of the retaining wall levels to provide the necessary screening and ground cover atablisatior. 3. The applicant has agreed to resK>ve 157 s.f. of existing hardcover within the 75-250* setback area. Such hardcover removals must be completed by ..^ . Please advise staff if additional information is required or if you have any questions concerning the new material submitted by the applicants prior to the meeting. J •I *1 I