Laserfiche WebLink
K ' <br />toM File «1301 July 14, 19M Pag* Threa of Fourto aove north 150 foot, leaving about 4.5 dry, buildable acrea within lot 2. Baaed on this configuration. Lot 2 would not bo further aubdividable under the two acre unaewered toning. Planning Coamiaaion ahould then <br />diacuaa whether a lot width variance aa eeaaured at the 50 foot aetback <br />from County Road 19 ia appropriate, and ahould diacuaa whether or not the <br />eaat/weat line between Lota 1 and 2 ahould be atraightened out rather than <br />gerrymandered, a* ia currently propoaed. <br />2. Ia Outlet A intended for iaiaiediate developaient aa a tingle <br />reaidential lot, or ia it atrictly to be held for a future aulwliviticm? If <br />it ia going to be aubdivided in the future, what configuration doea <br />Planning Coeeiaaion feel would be eoat appropriate? Given that <br />deteraiination, ia there any need to dedicate future acceaaea with the <br />current aubdiviaion? <br />3. Topographic nap waa not provided, <br />to thia Subdivision Af^lication? <br />OitcoatioB - <br />la a topographic aiap critical <br />The teated drainfield sites and proposed building site on the property are <br />250 feet or more eaat of County Road 19. In walking to the rear of Lot 2 <br />around the north end of the wetland, it was apparent that portions of this <br />property have been used aa a dumping ground for many years. Perhaps the <br />beat thing that could happen to this property would be developsMnt into 2 <br />acre lota with subsequent individual owners cleaning up the dump aites. <br />For the record, staff would note that most of the junk on the property will <br />have to be hauled out and not buried on the site. <br />Likewise, you will note the excessive amount of outside storage on the <br />property, including vehicles and building materials. The existing house is <br />currently rented, but upon completion of the subdivision it will be sold <br />to a new owner, and presumably the storage will disappear. A further <br />comment: If you plan to walk to the rear of the property to see the <br />building aite for lot 2, there is a pathway that generally follows the edge <br />of the wetland and it was dry the day I walked it, but wear your hiking <br />boots. <br />Staff Bernmmf ndBti<xai * <br />Staff would recnmend approval of thia subdivision, subject to resolution <br />of the issues noted above. If Planning Commission doea recommend <br />preliminary plat approval baaed upon the proposed configuration or one <br />similar to it, such a recommendation for approval should incorporate the <br />following conditions: <br />1. Payment of appropriate park fee for Lot 2. <br />2. Place specific stipulations on Outlot A that define the reasons it <br />is being approved as an outlot rather than as a separate Lot 3. <br />' / J <br />\ <br />*4 <br />j