Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />1 <br />t- <br />r.. . <br />5318S.6TO:Mayor antS City Council <br />Hart •♦rnhardion. City Md»lniatrat<||J7 <br />OUTV: May 25, 19tl <br />SUBt^KT: loninf Ordinanca Aaendacnt - Slqn Ordinafica <br />Attachmants fonlng ordlnanca Chaptar lf.«l <br />B. Propoaad Draft Languaga <br />ISStTB - oa tar* I nation aa to whathar tha Council <br />tha'draft languaga In Attachment B to tha Planning Comlaalon lot <br />eonaidaration and changaa *n tha algn ordinanca. <br />IITPROOOCT’^OH - A rev law of tha zoning ordinanca, as It ralataa to <br />iIgni'~T»afc"*hown it has a nu*ber of waatnaaaaa. Two o* <br />waaknaasat recently of concar.. are the . <br />allowed in raaldential areas togathar with t*'® , <br />teaporary signs. Mhlla there Is a 90 day paralt^applicants can <br />continue to have day parnits without any I l«lt as to how often <br />a permit can be renewed. <br />Discussion - As a result of the Issues raised <br />orJrna*nce“chaptar tha following draft language has <br />to address tha two Issues above plus other related isauaa In the <br />soninq chapter at this point. It is reca**endad that the samples <br />attached also be reviewed in the contest of this draft language <br />to set if there are other issues that Planning Co**lsslon would <br />like to consider In amending tha sign ordinanca. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Refer to the Planning CoBBtiission. <br />2. Ameisl and refer. <br />3. Table. <br />4. Take no action. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that this be ^® <br />pli^nFng^C^rssion for them to undertake the "®c®8sary ordinance <br />amendments applicable to signs for their review and <br />recommendation. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by__, that ? <br />be referred to the planning Commission for their review ana <br />recommendation. Ayes __, Nays __. <br />z. <br />f]'.. <br />- i <br />' 1 <br />J <br />; ^ <br />V <br />\(n <br />ij*'I«. <br />r II i <br />« I <br />Vt!1 <br />I <br />f <br />I! <br />i <br />J