Laserfiche WebLink
X* <br />% - <br />ZOM rile *1301 July 14, 1988 Page Three of Four_ *» 1KA 9lAsvino sbou^ 4»5 drv, hulIdabl® acre# within lotr. ■?:.%r;n\h\VcVTfV,u^VtYoT*^ 2 wLl/’not b. furth.,uid.r the ?wo acre on.ee.r.d .onlh,. « feotdiacuae whether a lot width variance aa eeatored at the 50 foot aethacafrom County Road 19 ia appropriate, and ahould diacuas whether .i™/w^ llnrbetween LotS 1 and 2 ahould be atraightened out rather thangerryauindered, aa in currently propoaed. <br />2. I a Outlet A Intended for infiediate <br />irt*- or ia it atrictlY to be held for a future aubdlvialon? If <br />it ia UiU to' be suMivided in the future, what thi? <br />Planning Coeeiaaion feel would be eoat appropriate? ®ivan that <br />detereinatLn, ia there any need to dedicate future acceaaea with the <br />current anbdiviaion? <br />3. topographic oap »aa not proT. laO. la a topographic nap critical <br />to thia Subdivision Application? <br />Diacusaioa - <br />The tested drainfield sites and proposed building site on the <br />Iso lUt or .Vra aa.t of County »oad 19. m walking to the * <br />around the north end of the wetland, it was apparent <br />property have been used aa a dueping ground for ?n^^^ <br />h®«t thina that could happen to thia property would be development into a <br />acre lota with subsequent individual owners cleaning up the <br />?o^ th^record, .taff would note that «oat of the junk on the property will <br />nave to be hauled out and not buried on the site. <br />Tiitawiae vou will note the excessive aeount of outside storage on the <br />property,'including vehicles and building eateria^. The <br />r«t«l, but upon cowpl.tloo of the » ?Sr?S« <br />to « now own.r, .nd pre.uwably the .tor.ge *‘Vh. or^rV; to .« thi <br />coBoaenti If you plan to walk to the rear of the <br />building »lto for lot 2, thore 1. a ^thwayOf the wetland and it was dry the day I walked it, but wear your hiki g <br />boots. <br />Staff Ksc o—andatloo ~ <br />staff would recoBBBend approval of this subdivision, aubje^ to <br />Afthr issued “ted above. If Planning Coaeission does recoeeend <br />nraliminarv plat approval based upon the propoaed configuration or one <br />SJSilar to it, such'^a^^ for approval ahould incorporate the <br />following conditions: <br />. 1. Payment of appropriate park fee for Lot 2. <br />2. Place specific stipulations on Out lot A \**® <br />is being approved as an outlot rather than as a separate Lot 3. <br />f <br />t.Mis:.a- <br />r/t <br />* f ^4 J <br />■■ii <br />I <br />Mv, ■ <br />y-», ■ <br />V ' <br />J