07-18-1988 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

^ »- t ^ Ifef m'SL -ili I I. ,*. I ) t ,*v ■f- #L? fj '•*1 I Ivill ■«J *il • «r* ■.A "I *•« , I ■u - -I M j ^1 '/» I I ■a:'i S31II.4TOsfwamtMayor ami City CouncilMark Barnhardaon, City kdniniatratc^fDimit Hay 25, 19S8SQBi^liCTt Xoning Ordinance IkaafidBcnt >- Sign Ordinance &itecbeent$ A. Xoning Ordinance Chapter IB.XI B. Prop<»ed Draft Language I5S01 - Deterelnation an to whether the Council vanta to refer IfielTraft language in Attachavnt B to the Planning Coeaaiaslon Cot conalderatlon and changes in the sign ordinance. lIlTBOWJCTXOfl - A review of the toning ordinance, as it relates to ilg na, k a a a h ow n it haa a nuaber of weakneaaea. Two of theae weakneaaea recently of concern are the typea of aigna that are allowed in reaidential areas together with the length of teaporary signs. While there is a 90 day perait^ippl icanta can continue to have 90 day peraita without any liait as to how often a perait can be renewed. DISCOSSI^OH - As a result of the issues raised in the toning ordrrnance chapter the following draft language haa been prepared to address the two issues above plus other related issues in the toning chapter at this point. It is recoBnended that the aaaplea attached also be reviewed in the context of this draft language to see if there are other issues that Planning CoaMission would like to consider in amending the sign ordinance. ALTBBMATIVES - 1. Refer to the Planning Commission. 2. Aaend and refer. 3. Table. 4. Take no action ^COMMENDATION - It is recCTanended that this be referred to the Planning Comalssion for them to undertake the necessary ordinance aaendments applicable to signs for their review and recommendation. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that Attachment B be referred to the Planning Coamission for their review and recoaimendation. Ayes , Nays * IS.i •f 1.-4 - — V. % J r) r! «I I % % • ■ i: \ «l