Laserfiche WebLink
fiI <br />I <br />I -Wk ■ ‘ - - •* •* <br />/y <br />1- * <br />• 'i <br />f <br />ij <br />1 <br />:i <br />i <br />Zoning Pile §1305 Page 2 of 3The epplicant*! grading plan shove that a 10* level grade vill be ■nlntained along all sides of the stock pile. Staff would note that additional erosion control aeasures Bust be SMintalned while the lOrOOO cubic yards is stored in the stock pile. Erosion control should be naintalned at a ainiaua along the east, south and north of the stock piles. <br />Applicant say select either staked hay bales or silt fence. In Glenn <br />Cook's report. Exhibit G, he also advises that silt fencing should be <br />placed near the southeast corner of the property to protect the downstrean <br />waterway. This should be installed prior to the cosstencestent of the larid <br />alteration. <br />Planning COaaisslon sMsd>ers may resmsber that the applicant was advised to <br />file the required MCVD permit application. Exhibit B, Mr. Larson noted the <br />usual districts concerns in developments of this type. Briefly to review, <br />he states the quality and quantity of run**off shall not be changed, erosion <br />control to prevent transport of sediments off^site during and after <br />construction and prompt restoration of disturbed areas with seed and mulch <br />or sod. In Mr. Pallansch's letter. Exhibit F, he notes no real concern on <br />Mr. Larsons part regarding the effects of the proposed addition on the site <br />and suggests no major requirements will be made of the applicant as a <br />result of the improvement. He also notes that they will follow all rules <br />of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. We will ask Mr. Pallansch for <br />any preliminary directives given to him by Mr. Larson at our meeting. <br />Cook's report suggests the need for a siltatlon pond at the southeast <br />corner of the property. The engineer has not suggested a specific sise for <br />the pond in his report, but has noted to staff that it should be <br />approximately 1/2 to 3/4 of an acre and noted in addition, that it would be <br />very advisable for both Cities to construct a retention or sediments pond <br />between the shared lot lines. Staff would suggest that the City and the <br />applicant work closely with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to <br />determine the appropriate size of such a retension pond. <br />Staff Bspfessendstiop <br />To approve the Conditional Use Permit application of Washington Scientific, <br />Inc. for the property located at 2605 West Wayzata Boulevard that would <br />permit the temporary stock piling of 10,000 cubic yards to be used in the <br />final grading of the western elevations of the property per grading plans <br />by the Vogt Corporation dated 5/19/88, revisions 6/29/88 based on the <br />following findings: <br />1. The proposed temporary stock piling and alteration and final <br />grades proposed by applicant will be in accord with the objectives of <br />the Zoning Chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site <br />is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. <br />2. That the proposed temporary stock piling of fill and the final <br />grading plans proposed would not be detrimental to the public health, <br />safety, or welfare or materially Injurious to properties or <br />improvements in the vicinity. <br />3. The proposed Conditional Use Permit complies with each of the <br />applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter requiring no variances to <br />the required standards. <br />a <br />* <br />J <br />{ <br />i <br />,*• <br />W. af- <br />i % <br />; <br />4 <br />e <br />I <br />i <br />3 <br />..I <br />r <br />t. <br />BA <br />* .% <br />f