Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />November 27, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 2 of 10 <br />Finance Director Olson explained how property taxes are calculated, beginning with the Hennepin County <br />Assessor’s Estimated Market Value. The preliminary budget and tax levy was approved by the Council on <br />September 11. The final budget and levy will be adopted December 11. He noted the City of Orono’s tax <br />Capacity is the second lowest in the area. He also showed the City’s proposed general fund revenue and <br />expenditure budgets for 2024. Total estimated revenues and expenditures are $11,536,630, an increase of <br />4.9 percent from 2023. The total proposed levy is $9,415,100. Compared to 2023, the levy is increasing <br />by $1,028,100 or 12.3%. <br />Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 6:35 p.m. <br />Denise Reilley, 3405 High Lane, spoke to object to the budget and the resulting 26 percent increase in her <br />personal Orono property taxes. Since Walsh has been mayor, she said, the City’s levy has increased from <br />$5.2 million in 2017 to a proposed $9.4 million for 2024, which is an increase of more than 80 percent. <br />She said part of the increase is to fund a new Fire Department including the hiring of a Chief and <br />firefighters and the purchase of trucks. However, the contract with Long Lake runs through 2025. This <br />past summer, Long Lake requested and was granted an injunction to keep Orono from breaking that <br />contract, she said. This past week a judge found that Orono had violated the injunction and ordered Orono <br />to pay Long Lake’s attorney fees and other charges, including $2,000 per violation. She said she objects <br />to her taxes being used to pay attorney’s fees and other costs due to the City’s actions and pointed out <br />those costs are probably not yet reflected in the budget. She asked that there be a moratorium on the new <br />Fire Department until after a referendum, which would be the election that occurs before the end of the <br />contract. <br />Kim Carswell, 261 Cygnet Place, said the Council keeps talking about tax rates remaining stable but the <br />funds the City pulls in has increased more than 80 percent since 2017 so it is spending what it has rather <br />than prioritizing needs. Continuing to talk about the tax rate remaining steady is not clear communications <br />to the citizens as to how much money the City keeps bringing in and spending, she said. <br />James Elder, 195 South Brown Road, said the examples are based on property values remaining static. No <br />one’s property values have remained the same. He said the presentation slides didn’t show that so that is <br />not Truth in Taxation, which he referred to as an oxymoron. He noted the inflation of property values and <br />the increase of the City’s tax capacity as a result. That doesn’t mean the City needs to keep spending all <br />that money, he said. The more property values go up the more money the City has to spend, and it’s not <br />well accounted for. He also pointed to enterprise funds as actually being costs to taxpayers such as water <br />and sewer. He said those are taxes described as fees. Enterprise funds carry balances and create a slush <br />fund that can be transferred to other accounts, which is not as clear to the taxpayers. <br />Kelly Prchal, 4705 Watertown Road, also said she objects to incredible spending on an unnecessary Fire <br />Department and she objects to tax dollars going to fines being caused by this spending and recruitment of <br />firefighters. The budget has a line item for fire services from Long Lake for more than $600,000 in 2024 <br />and a line item for Orono Fire that is higher than that, at more than $700,000 without yet providing any <br />services, she said. She asked why the City is moving forward with duplicating fire services when <br />neighboring communities are joining together. <br />Luann Tolliver said she was there because she is very concerned about the 12.2 percent levy increase <br />notice she received from Hennepin County. She said if some areas of the budget increase it is necessary to <br />decrease other areas, adding that’s how she has to run her budget. She said she can’t spend more money <br />5