Laserfiche WebLink
.« V <br />‘ I <br />Hi <br />M <br />f N \ <br />I <br />!v. ; <br />. I <br />J <br />NUNXTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION . <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 <br />-V <br />V ■5^ <br />(fir 1 -1? 1976 - Gamble - Continued) <br />Peter Achey of472l!)NB^>'Sidc voiced <br />Due to the lay of the l^ttL Ache>' fdt ^ . <br />hazard, while the peak of me^foad on Bayside would proviac Avnai he telt would be a <br />good safe entry <br />4^ <br />N <br />.VUboKh said the County nomuUy driveway access away from County roads <br />However, in this case, the County wouldfl^iccess lo be from Bayside Road rather than <br />McCulty, due to the high usage of McCuUy. SIr. Peterson noted a problem with <br />coihbiniiig the driveways due to ihe.steep g <br />X <br />It was noted that a walkaway was shown for Lot 1 linking it to the Luce Line. <br />Lindquist moved, Peterson seconded, to approve the two-lot subdivision applicauon for <br />Don Gamble at Bayside Road to include the 8 Staff rccommendauoqs^bsted. along <br />with the additional requirements of wood chips to be used on the walkway <br />connecting Lot 1 to the Luce Line, and lot access subject to approval by Hennepin County <br />and thrCitv of Orono. Ayes 7. Nays 0 <br />/ <br />(^f) THIS ITEM WAS REMOVEp f • # -• • <br />(#3) #1895 PAT WOLFE, 2971 CASCO POLNT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:25-7:50 P.M. <br />The Cerrificatc of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />Mr, Woife was nresent. <br />Gaffron reported this application is for an adci-tbe-fact variance lor a shed located in the <br />0-75' zone. The shed is 10’xl2'. requiring a building permit, is located 8' from the <br />shoreline, and constitutes 120 s f of hardcover It is also 3 5' from the side lot line next to <br />the public access and beach. The shed was replaced, rather than repaired, which <br />according to the code cannot be done in the 0-75’ zone making it non-conforming. <br />The DNTl recommended denial in a lener, later revising their recommendation that if the <br />shed was placed 10’ from shoreline, the applicant should go to the City for approval. <br />Gaffion said there is a problem with the exact location of the property lot line A Torrens <br />action probably would be required to determine where the lot line .s located This could <br />result in the loss of beach for the City The City recommends denial It should be noted <br />that the neighbors have said the shed has improved in appearance. <br />I \ <br />I <br />N/I : <br />-.rr.. . .