My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
12-12-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 1:07:04 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 1:02:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
412
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• > <br />REQUEST FOR COLTMCIL ACTION <br />DATE: November 7. 199 <br />ITEM NO.: {o <br />)4 <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title Assist. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #1895 Pat Wolfe, 2871 Casco Point Road - Variance <br />Zoning District: LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1/2 acre. <br />Application: After-the-fact variances for construction of I0’.xl2’ storage shed located 8 ’ from <br />the shoreline, (arguably) 3.5 ’ from side lot line, and constituting 120 s.f. of hardcover in the 0- <br />75’ zone where no hardcover is allowed. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Planning Commission Minutes 10/17/94 <br />B - Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/18/94 <br />C - Memo and Exhibits of 10/12/94 <br />Discussion <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of 10/12/94. Briefly, applicant constmeted a I0’xl2’ <br />storage shed near the lakeshore. replacing a somewhat larger deteriorated shed in the same <br />location. The construction was done without a pemit, and in violation of code sections <br />regarding hardcover, ‘trucrare setback from ihoreline, and the non-conforming use section. <br />The applicant requests to leave the shed as is in its current location, citing a number ot reasons <br />for the request in his letter of October lOih. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Plannint! Commission reviewed this application at their October 17th meeting and on a vote of <br />7-0 recommended denial of the request, noting the lack of acceptable hardship or justification <br />for granting of variances, and noting that alternate locations exist on the propeny where the <br />structure could meet code requirements. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff concurs with Planning Commission that the variances should be denied based on lack of <br />acceptable hardship or Justification. Staff further recommends that the applicant be required to <br />remove the structure to a location meeting code requirements.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.