My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
12-12-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 1:07:04 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 1:02:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
412
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />•I <br />I <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The three member Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />November 21, 1994 and recommended approval of the variances as proposed, <br />based upon the following findings: <br />A. At just over 16.000 s. f. in area, the combined lots contain substantial area <br />for construction of single family residence without the requirement of any <br />variances to the zoning chapter. <br />B. Municipal sewer is available and assessed to the property. <br />C.Developed lot sizes in the neighborhood range from .14 acre to 1.5 acres <br />of dry land, averaging about 0.55 acres. The combination of Lots 8 and <br />9 at 0.37 acre yields a lot size that is not inconsistent with other lots in the <br />neighborhood. <br />There is no other land available for purchase in order to make the lot size <br />conforming. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propeny are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City statt, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />*
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.