Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />ZooM^ Ftk #1895 <br />Scpmeixt I#. IMM <br />Pafc : <br />Backcnnmd <br />n« ifSflicM PKcfSh OKBiructol A ocw l(r » I'* 9»cU »h»:h iwicU by itM <br />Impcctiom ncpMtaKfli m Aufint 19^3 «hri9^ thai uici) a OmU a <br />ftm uk alkmcU lae usi lo leave « to tts cwmo KKataoo re'^uire varuikes trvm the <br />lai;e»h0» iethack and hankovtf rcqairenwol* <br />Mr Wolfe ba$ ackiwwkdfed ttM fhe dieil o cssentiany a cotnrieiB rcpljcemeoi of a <br />tfai fonneriy e»i«ed in (hr iafor kjcaifc« Tte b coaftnned by the letter^ fn>m ihc <br />DeiflibtKiiv p«Jf««Tty o«nm licnsew. sych total irplacefnem comitnites a vioiataiti the <br />non^onfocmii^ use wciioo of the code, wfbeh b written the clear intent that old <br />unscaBid tauiihiijis ^**-'*^ thr lafccdiuta vliindd he mi weed rather than replaced- thcc <br />lAhibd 1) <br />As can be seen fnen the sahiiia teois of eorrei|vifcfcncc. staff las reiterated fo the <br />thb stnicture is illegal and must he relocated to a Ic^al locaiion on the property, <br />meetitv setback and hardcover requirements Adding to the proNem is that the eastern <br />boundary of the property ts in question due to lack tsf detail in (he original 1 879 plat and due <br />to a legal descnprkm that lacks detail. !n fakt. many surveys of the prc;srry have been done <br />throueh the years, and they are incisnsisicni The nk>st recent survey merely reflects stafTs <br />intcrpl-ctauoo of wtel the le^ description imended to describe, and whKh applicacl’s surveyor <br />fell h£l as much juMifKJrtioo as ^ny ot the prevKHis vcrsK ’fn. <br />Probtematically. this most recent venton. while placii^ the shed wiifi.n applicant's <br />property , results in a sigtuficani narrowing of the City » beach right-of-way which could caus^ <br />shtnificant proble? is x continued use of the beach Because ol this issue, staff rccouimends <br />that if Planning * ‘•.'^ais'KHi finds jusiif'icaiion to allow the shed to remain as located, such <br />approval should be cvmditMned on applicam completing a torrens or land registration action to <br />rcKh a conclusion as to where the property line actually is. <br />Siaienient of Hardship <br />Please review applicani's hardship Maienwnt on the application tonn and his letter of <br />request. Given the relatively dear intent of the municipal code, is there any justincation <br />presented that supps>r.s the existing shed locationThere arc other places on the prs^perty (see <br />Kxhibii II) in which a shed could be legally located Fxisting hardcover as calculated by staff <br />is 24 94*1 in the 75-250 ’ zone. Tlwre is likely a potential for minor hardcover removals to <br />allow the shed to be relocated withinit a hardcover variance or with a very' minor variaiKc ot <br />less than I %.