Laserfiche WebLink
iTAtl Ot <br />j 31 M A* <br />^DEPARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES <br />ffETIK) MATOU - 1200 MAUfCS MAO. ST. PAO.. S&100 <br />772-7910 <br />S«pt«At«r 37. I9f4 <br />?“C=iVE0 <br />SEP t 9 192^ <br />f r/ CP <br />xr. Hi)i« Caffron <br />City of oroAO <br />S.O. Sox <br />Crystal Say. Hirniasota 99122 <br />R£» LWfO CSC APPLICATIOSS. CXTT Of OROSO. NCNKCPXfl COUNTY <br />Daar xr. caffron: <br />X hava coercnta on tha Collowino land uaa applications. <br />#1995. Pat WQlfa.-133-lii. Tha applicant <br />raqussts aftar-tha-fact hardcovar, avara^a lakaahora aatback and <br />laka aatback variancas for tha raconstruction of a shad. DNR Matro <br />watars raco«u»anda that tha city deny tha varianca raquasts as thay <br />ara currantly proposad. Thara ara many altarnata locations on tha <br />lot .harm tha shad would ba abla to maat tha city's satback <br />ra<|uiraaants. Ua also <|\iastion uhathar hardship axists. <br />#1999. Gustafson Dasion on bahalf of Janas Laar. 2529 Dunuoodv <br />Avanua (27-132-11. Spring Park Bavi. Tha applicant requests <br />approval of a conditional usa permit and varianca for grading and <br />construction of retaining valla within tha 0-79' lakashora aatback. <br />Wa understand that thara is an existire? erosion problem and that a <br />replacement wall of soma type is required. Wa do not object to tha <br />city approving retaining wall work at this location as long as: tha <br />city engineer agrees that the dewign is structurally sound and will, <br />prevent erosion probleas, disturbance of the existing trees and <br />vegetation in the lakeshore area is ainiaized, and any shoreline <br />riprapping is done in accordance with the r-I^s of the Hinnehaha <br />Creek Watershed District and the CNR conditions for not requiring <br />a permit. <br />i#1968. Keith and Vivian Banoert. 35QQ Bayslda RoadPIP 05-117-23 <br />n QQ19. f27-l33-23. Stubbs Bavi. The applicants request several <br />variances for construction of a driveway and single family <br />residence. DNR Metro waters reccaaends that the city dfiay the <br />variance requests as they are currently proposed. In particular, <br />we are concerned about the proposed driveway off of CR 84 (Bayside <br />Road) which would require considerable grading and vegetation <br />removal on a bluff. Further, it is our understanding that even if <br />the proposed extensive alterations to the existing bluff were <br />allowed, the applicants would still have a marginal access based on <br />AN EQUAL opportunity EMPLOYER