Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: SqiNcmbcrS, 199-4 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Departawnt ApfNwal: <br />Nave Miduel P. Gaffroo <br />Ticit Aim. PtaDBiBf A Zoaing AdeaniMrator <br />Adniiiistrator Rciicwcd;Afcnda Sect <br />Zoniag <br />Dcscriptkw: B-2 Zoning District Amendmem <br />LbtrfErtiMtt <br />A - Proposed Amendment <br />B - Sttff Memo 5/31/94 <br />C - Kevin Staunton Memo 7 22/94 <br />In 1993 Council directed Planning Commission to review and make recon^ndalioos regarding <br />™ S District ordinance. Planning Commission has completed that review, resulting <br />o4in.n« r^on.m«d«k>n. “J»ckgr^«d <br />process resulting in this proposed ordinance is provided m Exhibit B. and m the 1 ihiek blue <br />CTveted document compilation which Council received earlier this summer, <br />RemilaUoii o f Oociati <br />The proposed ordinance revisions incorporate a number of new uses which Coun^ <br />should be regulated. The majority of recommended changes do in fact relate to the “sc oi <br />nropertv r^r than the physical aspects of the property . Planning CommiMion concluded that <br />rekSTini the lot area/width/seibackyhardcover standards to match the reality of our exis mg <br />marinas was not appropriate. Planning Commission did suggest iha* riLct <br />a conditional use fitmit tor a use which they have not had m the past should be required to meet <br />the landscaping requirements. <br />ni r'r.mfMicci.'in reviewed the proposed ordinance with Kevin Staunton. His memo briefly <br />code, and suggest iha. op«a.io«.l activijics might be <br />hetter reffulated bv licensing. Perhaps the downfall of regulating by license in the past was a <br />rnmhina^n of encumbering the license with requirements to make physical changes to the <br />rxrper. aXXof licemes when that did no. «cur. but taking no legal action nor <br />imposing sanctions for noncompliance.