My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
11-28-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 12:41:52 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 12:39:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
never had a formal parking lot, and its customers, the majorit>- of which are <br />with a drive-through letter drop and eliminate parking on the shoulder. <br />The sundards for a parktng lot in the RR IB District require a 50 ’ front setback. Since the <br />Iding IS toV within the 50' front yard, am! its only public entrance is on the tront <br />exiMing OUIIU g ' oarkine lot would have to be direcUy west and to the rear ot the <br />°b^i^« public. Further, such parking lot would severely <br />^l^h WO the existing Crvsul Bay park and playground area. An ingresvegress dnveway <br />would have to cross the front yard in order to reach such a parktng lot. <br />proposed Lovout wmI Construction <br />r* is ar^TtwfhL w ZZ in front of the building n>o»» County ^ <br />will fj^sted no parking. The informal gravel parking area on the north side of the building <br />will be reverted to grass. <br />Office !i one time. Use of the post office is not anticipated to increase stgmficantly. <br />Impact oo Ncighborini Properties <br />S'S'Sl i-v »«. «l .V P-'S™ •" “ " <br />a buffer to the neighboring property. <br />including only Lois 1. 2 and 3 sou^ of 'T^is" <br />to be needed at this time. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Please review the description of hardship and unusual ^l!fa“ecoL^ <br />Commission agrees that the proposed parking lot location is any <br />for front setback variance approval would be appropriate. Planning Commission should
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.