Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17. 1994 <br />(#1 - #1976 - Gamble • Continued) <br />Peter Achey of4720 Bayaide vcMced his concern with being able to safely access the lots. <br />Due to the lay of the land. Achey felt placing the two driveways together would create a <br />hazard, while the peak of the ro^ on Bayside would provide what he felt would be a <br />good safe enhy. <br />Mabusth said the County prefers locating new curb cuts off County roads. However, in <br />thn case, the County would approve access at Bayside Road rather than McCuUey. due to <br />the high y of MoCulley. Mr. Peterson noted a problem with combtning the driveways <br />due to the steep grade and said a safe access will be a priority. <br />It was noted that a walkaway was shown for Lot 1 linkii^ it to the Luce Lir e. <br />Lindquist moved. Peterson seconded, to ^)prove the two-lot subdivision application for <br />Don Gamble at 4680 Bayside Road to include the 8 Staff recommendations Kst^ along <br />with the addHiowi requirements that walkway area connectmg Lot 1 to Luce Line be <br />constructed at existhig grades with wood chips placed on surface, and curb cuts sul^ect to <br />approvalby Hennepin County and the City of Orono. Ayes 7. Nays 0. <br />(#2) THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA <br />(«3) #1195 PAT WOLFE, 2971 CASCO POINT ROAD - AFTER-THE-FACT <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:25-7:50 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Mr. Wolfe was present. <br />Gaffron reported this ap|4ication is for an after-the-fact variance for a shed located in the <br />0-75* zone. The shed is l(fxl2’. requiring a building permit, is located 8* from the <br />shoreline, and constitutes 120 s.f of hardcover within the lakeshore protected area. It is <br />also 3.5* from the side lot line next to the public access and beach. The shed was tenatty <br />reconstructed, except for foundation slab, and would require the approval of the City. <br />The DNR recommended denial of the variance and advised City to enforce its regulations. <br />Gaffron said there is a problem with the exact location of the side lot line. A Torrens <br />action probably would be required to detomine where the lot line is located. This could <br />result in the loss of public beach area. The n«ghbors have sent supportive letters noting <br />the shed has improved in appearance.