My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 12:21:27 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 12:17:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />%^ STATE OF <br />D^lKi[iS<0>S'. <br />.Tde ^artment of natural resources <br />- 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 <br />PHONE NO. <br />METRO WATERS <br />772-7910 <br />1200 >il£ nC <br />October 13, 1994 <br />Mr. Mike Gaffron <br />City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 66 ecT,',Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />re: land USE APPLICATIONS, CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY <br />Dear Mr. Gaffron: <br />*. «« 4-ho followinq land use applications on theI have conunents on the <br />Planning Commission agenda for 10/17/9 . <br />M,.i1vn Dorr Property, Tonlc»wa Road QT^ <br />133-24L. <br />The applicants «ques^t approval of^an. ^the^fr^perlf th« <br />variance for construction There was a question aboutcurrently contains a seasonal cabin. There <br />whether the steep areas , ,, wa concur with city staff <br />feet from the lake were ^^““^^^"^“yfrordinance: thesethat, based on strict interpretation of the ci_^ <br />steep areas are not bluffs. we nave no should <br />lakeShore setback variance te<^«t However, the y <br />^.0,1 Thomas W. rashman Property. 1509 Tom T,aka Boulevard IZlt <br />160P)^ <br />The applicant requests approval of a ^«iance^for^street_^and^side <br />yard setbacks for a new garage ® f^y approving the garage <br />deck. We have no objection the proposed deck <br />replacement. However, we recommend the ^gting house is <br />adLtion on the lake side of the house. The object to <br />already right at the top of ^a^ppears that it may beany further encroachment on the bluff. i PP house <br />feLible to construct a smaller deck on th® ®ast s d^ ^f^^ overall <br />that would meet the bluff f^^tures such as the stoneapproval, we would encourage removal of features suca <br />walk and patio block area. <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTU^^>TV "MPLOYER
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.