11-14-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1977 October 11. 1994 Page 2 M - Hoffman Letter 10/7/94 N - House Profile O - Second Level Floor Plan - Potential Guest Apartme.»t p - Lerr^ Description of Request Applicants propose the construction of a new year round residence to be placed behM ^ front line of the exisfrng seasonal cabin extending to the detached garage to the west of the seasonal cabin Structure has been located on the property in an anempt to munmize excavatiom of steeper elevations to the west resulting in the loss of several mature trees. Review ^ibit F. ^e slr^ture will be located out of the bluff impact zone and 75' lakeshore setback area. Structure will be approximately 93’ from the 929.4 elevation at the structure s closest projection to the lake. Gaffron completed an analysis of the topography of the area to deteimine the Presence of bluffs (Exhibits G H and I). Staff has also reviewed this information with Ceil Strauss of the DNR^ She concurs that the only bluff area on this property is the bank immediately adjacent to the shoreline. She confirms upon review of the staffs analysis information that steeper elevations to the west would not be part of a bluff but area is subject to the special controls dealing with development within steep slopes. Review Exhibit N. note the peak height of the structure will be ?0’ above existing grade at approximately the 955 elevation. The grade level of house to the south is at the 980 elevaliom Review Exhibit M, the neighboring properly owner to the south voices major concern with th new home being placed within the present footprint advising that the current seasonal T. 19 20*^al height blocks certL views of the lake. They ask that the house ^ ^aced ac the average bkeshore setback line so as to minimize any '^npact u^n tteir Note that homes recently constructed within the immediate neighborhood wer . meet the average lakeshore setback line. They prefer that the proposed the immediate north also be required to meet the average lakeshore setback line. The "^igh^ asks that since they are unable to attend the meeting on the 17th that you table all action on profxlLl Tme str^Icture is not to meet the average lakeshore setback requirement. Review Exhibit O. the second level fioor plan reveals a potential guest apartmen* over the garage. Although the area adjacent to the silting area is labeled wet bar and not of cooking surface), applicants should advised of future use to determine permit will be necessary. The only access to area is via the second floor exercise room.