My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 12:21:27 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 12:17:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i CCl'fmi meetingrequest for council action .\’GV 4 ]QQ4DATE, IWmmITEM NO,Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Title Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section:Zonine <br />District: LR-IB. Lakeshore ResMeraial requiring 1 acre in area. Area of progeny <br />74,600 s.f. or 1.7 acres. <br />Additional Exhibits <br />Q - DNR Letter, Ceil Strauss <br />R - 10/24/94 Letter of Raymond & Ruth Hoffman <br />S - Planning Commission Action Notice <br />Brief Review of Application <br />Annlicams seek approval of 9T encroachment of the average lakeshore settack The mw <br />resMence strucmre^will be placed approximately at the same lakeshore setba^ of the existing <br />two sto>y seasonal cabin that has existed on the property for over fifty years. The new <br />V^n exreiri wM«rly to the area occupied by detached garage. Steep slopes to the west of tte <br />dSlaregJ^^Sui^ere restrictions on the building envelope. If the structure was m <br />coni^ to .TavUe lakeshore setback line, major cuts into the steeper elevauons would be <br />required along with the removal of several mature trees. <br />architect, they now agree to the proposed location, review Exhibit . <br />In a 5 ■> vote the Planning Commission recommended approval of the 97 <br />verage irshTre srack'line. subject to applicants ’ represenutives meeting " <br />in an'auempt to either seek approval of the Ihe <br />would meet the required 75’ lakeshore setback as well and <br />at the lakeshore. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the tind.ngs <br />conditions of the Planning Commission ’s recommendation of approval.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.