My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 12:21:27 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 12:17:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1972 <br />October 10, 1994 <br />Pace 2 <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes installation of a 12’xl6’4" three season porch to the street or nonh side of <br />existing residence. The existing stoop and stair are located 25’ rom street lot line. The <br />proposed three season porch would be 18 ’. The house to the east is located sligh ‘'y behind front <br />line of existing residence and is 10 ’+ from the shared lot line. The residence to the west is in <br />line with the front line of the subject structure. Applicant’s residence is 14 ’ + from west lot line <br />and the proposed addition will be 22’. The mature evergreen in the street yard will not be lost <br />as a result of the construction. <br />The rc! idence has been vacant for over nine years. The current owner and applicant is a retired <br />contrac or and has slowly worked on the renovation of the structure over the summer months. <br />Staff me* with the applicant on site and discussed the issue of future otf street parking as <br />residence u not served by a driveway nor off street parking area. Note there is 610 s.f. of <br />available hard-'over and there is adequate width within the west side yard to allow a minimum <br />width driveway *o rear yard. Applicant did discuss his plans tor a future garage to the rear yard <br />located out of the J'.ardcover zone (review Exhibit E) but note strucmral coverage facts above, <br />applicant is already at 1 1.5% with proposed improvements with an additional 490 s.f. allowed <br />for additional structural coverage. If a garage was to be installed on this property, a structural <br />coverage variance would be required. <br />Review Exhibit G, note change in roof line at northwest comer ot residence. The variance need <br />not be addressed for this expansion as intensification of roof structure will occur within <br />conforming street and side setbacks. <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Review Exhibit A. applicant notes minimal living space and enhancement of structure. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Would proposed improvement be consistent with development within immediate <br />neighborhood? <br />2. Can three season porch be located so as to conform to setback standards, refer to <br />Exhibits E and F? <br />3. As it is the intention of applicant to install a future garage, should applicant be advised <br />to amend current application to include future garage that would require a lot coverage <br />variance
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.