My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 12:21:27 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 12:17:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/;fA>.-. ^. <br />Ri-:Qn<:sT for coi ^cil action <br />DATE: Nove^^^/1 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A Mabusth <br />Title Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #1972 Daniel Radford, 3593 Crystal Place - Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District: LR-IC, Lakeshore Residential requiring a 1/2 acre in area. <br />E.xistina lot area = 8.715 s.f. (4.875 s.f. of lot area subject to hardcover controls). <br />Brief Review of Application <br />Please refer to the enclosed staff memo dated October 10. 1994 for more background on this <br />review. The applicant seeks a street setback variance for a 12'xl6.4 ’ three season porch. The <br />e.xisting stoop/landing and stairs are located 25 ’ from the street lot line. The proposed three <br />season porch will be 18 ’. The proposed structure will extend no closer to the street than the <br />existing deck and stairs of the house to the immediate west ot the property. The applicant was <br />asked why the addition could not be relocated to the rear or south side of structure. Applicant <br />noted that the addition would have a major impact on natural lighting to the rear bedroom and <br />living room area. He also noted drainage problems based on existing roof lines as all drainage <br />is . ^signed to flow to street yard. <br />The City has yet to receive negative comments from the adjacent neighbors. The applicant was <br />also cautioned as to a need for a future lot coverage variance if a larger detached garage was <br />proposed at some time. .Applicant was encouraged to amend the current application so that the <br />lot coverage variance could be addressed in a comprehensive review ot the property. Applicant <br />stated that at a minimum he would be addressing the need tor an ott street parking area and was <br />not considering construction of the detached structure in the immediate future. Planning <br />Commission cautioned that this may have an impact on a future variance review. <br />The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the street setback variance and <br />conditioned approval on the following; <br />1 . L'pon application for building permit, applicant w'as to provide a landscape plan providing <br />screening of proposed addition within the street yard. <br />2. Prior to the City issuing the building permit tor new construction, the tollowing was to <br />be completed; <br />A. Cleanup of rear yard where materials and equipment are stored.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.