My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
11-14-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 12:21:27 PM
Creation date
12/11/2023 12:17:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i i <br />H: <br />■% <br />business lo our home or neighborhood. It is our intent that the strucmre be <br />insulated and finished to allow us to heat and cool the work area but by no means <br />is it intended or designed to function as a separate living space. The flooring is <br />cement with some panicle board sub-flooring in the work spaces. The bathroom <br />is designed to function as a potting room for plants and garden materials and has <br />a deep sink for cleaning paint bruj-ies. etc. We do not intend to rent out this <br />space or use it for commercial retaU, we also do not intend that it be used for a <br />guest house or apartment. The garage has no kitchen or food prep area and no <br />bedrooms. <br />On October 17.1994 the Orono Planning Commission considered the conditional <br />use permit as proposed and recommended denial of a conditional use permit based <br />on one or more of the following findings: <br />A. Property does not meet the required area standard for a second residential <br />unit. <br />It is not the intent of the applicants to create a separate independent unit <br />or guest house of the structure. It shall merely function as an accessory <br />auxiliary use of the principal strucmre. <br />C The finished living area will serve as a work place. Applicants do not <br />propose a bedroom or kitchen use within the expanded living space. <br />9. At their October 17, 1994 meeting the Planning Commission w^ asked to <br />consider the proposed living area expansions to determine if any modifications or <br />eliminations would be necessary. The Planning Commission reco^ended that <br />no modifications or eliminations be made in any of the proposed improvements <br />but directed that because of the potential for easy conversion to guest house use <br />that an appropriate deed restriction be developed to alert all fumre property <br />owners that this strucmre could never be converted into a guest house. <br />10. Per Section 10.03. Subdivision 7, "One Building Per Lot" Except in the case of <br />a planned residential development as provided for hereinafter, no more than one <br />principal building shall be located on a lot . . ." <br />B <br />Page 3 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.