Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1967 <br />September 15, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />evaluation process. Since the Olson property currently has a faUing septic system, the primary <br />site will be used immediately and the alternate site would remain for potential future use. <br />Lot Standards for Existing Residence <br />Please review the proposed single lot division. Exhibit G. In the narrow context of a single lot <br />subdivision, this lot would require a number of variances to lot standards, i.e.: <br />- Only 187’ of frontoge on Bayside Road. <br />- A 30’ setback from the proposed south lot line which would be considered as a rear <br />lot line, but which becomes a side lot line in the context of the larger subdivision. <br />Clearly, this Mot division only makes sense in the context of the full multi-lot subdivision. <br />Proposed Outlot A <br />Again in the context of the single lot subdivision, the layout of Outlot A would be illogical. <br />Howeier, it fits together in the context of the complete proposal. <br />If Lot 1 is split off from the remainder of the Olson parcel as proposed, and Outlot Ai* created, <br />what is the down side to the City if the future subdivision for some ** <br />In creating Outlot A, with the very narrow neck at the southeast comer of the Geffire p pe^ <br />and leaving 150’ of frontage on Bayside Road, the outlot would not be conf<^mg in lot wid* <br />as all individual building site. It would certainly be appropriate that the City place specific <br />restrictions on Outlot A, as follows; <br />1 Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall not ^ <br />■ family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. <br />2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlot A is platted for future development. <br />3 Any future platting of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre property must »*)clude <br />■ ihe^OIson property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming confomimg to <br />the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zonmg Distn . <br />Proposed Future Access Location <br />I. is the developer s imem that a new private toad be developed <br />Hennepin County DOT that the current driveway locauon would be an p <br />location. <br />A