Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />(#3) Uem #1967- D. Peterson/Geflfrc - Continued(#3) Uem #1967- U. reiersuwwt--------------- <br />initial request was invoWuig six «. nroicct. The City ’s two primary goals <br />Appticant's have been 1^ locations and drainfidds that would meet the 6V* slope <br />have been to create wishes to separate the Geffre residence <br />limit for mound systems. At this ^ t, a|^ thdr 17 5 acre parcel, so it can be sold <br />C.d».ppto..o.. *■*« off <br />only. b)require Park Dedication ^ setback standards of the <br />later tins year.laicr u»» j»" • <br />The app..c». s«bmi««.. ^vision s,..ing .he <br />Z. The surveyor created a new ,o show .he City wha. <br />had been sen. ou. for .he The revision changed .he 3(V setback from <br />£ S£'“SE * - f <br />the conceptuw nvc-.uv if they wisn lo ciosc u. <br />four-lot revision would requite hat a 1^*^ matter is in question whether the <br />an ouiioi wrowi wvuiw ——— <br />Smhh asked if this woiiM be setting * ^^CTSOT^d'dis woul7cause <br />«.™,gy approve only an oudo. wiUmu. OuUo. A deeded <br />Gefte to be less than two acres and ^ sub-division picture. To gam <br />first to Gefi&e. Gaf&on said ^ °%*™^^“^ouJraskiS D. Peterson why the trade of <br />the easement that the Geffre lot P ’ this time. Peterson said this would be <br />properties under contideration is not '>««« through, and asked <br />STb^Sr. S* next meeting buk mem.whae. ^ <br />only for approval the desirabiliv of having the <br />forward to the City Couiral the County will require access m bo* <br />^ofS r^* Oaflfon st«ed a conceptual agreement wouk. need <br />conditions attached to it.