Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1967 <br />October 13, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />. Per the County Public Works request and past City practice, if C^Uot B is <br />eventually used for road purposes, then both the Olson and Geffre residences wi <br />be required to remove their Bayside Road accesses and construct new acces^s to <br />the wUot road. This raises the question as to how or whether the Olson <br />“sidence will be able to access from an interior road if Outloi B is never used <br />and the 14 acre parcel is developed using access from the White property. Since <br />Olson ’s existing driveway is at what the County considers a safe location, perhaps <br />this continued access would be acceptable. <br />• K-P Properties ’ Don Peterson has advised it is their intent to initiate subdivision <br />of Ae ifacres (using Outlots B and D for access) as soon as septic testing is <br />complete... <br />Staff Recommendation <br />suff recommends approval of the applicanfs current proposal subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />1. Outlots A. B. and C shall remain in Si unUlS^Jtdeveloped. Outlot D shall remain in ownership with Lot 1, Block 2 until outioi <br />C is further developed <br />2. <br />5. <br />Outlot A is considered as an unbuildable remainder <br />of OuUol C. OuUot A shall be either combined with Outlof B ^Sbl’lfeaHy <br />1 if Outlots B and D are na used for road pu.^ “ S ‘nd for <br />combined with Lot 1. Block 2, in the evem that Outlots B and D as used <br />roadway purposes. <br />Outlots B and D are platted for future roadway purposes and shall ** <br />combined with adjacent properties. <br />lots. <br />in the event that Outlots B and D are us^ « an ^«s roa^se^ing a fotur. <br />development in Outlot C, the and eliminate directshall revise their driveway locations onto said outlot roadway ana eiinu <br />access to Bayside Road.