Laserfiche WebLink
r 1 <br />rnnrrt HMK ^pMQRAiaaM 3300 Plptr Jaffniy Tower <br />222 SoutA Nlotb Sacct <br />MtnnetpolU, Mlnneiou 55402 <br />(612) 333-»SOO <br />TO:aiwl zonini Administratot <br />Ciiy of Orono <br />V^A TELECQgY <br />FROM: <br />RE: <br />DATE: <br />Thomas J. Bwielt, EsQ> <br />Item #J9<7 Robert S. Olson/K-P Properties, Inc. <br />October i*’I994 <br />Mike, after the 1«‘CouwU rdalefia06«4.1 am <br />documents you ,o the proposed large lot labeiled Outlot B appears <br />to require accc»» — <br />„ a ia«r atmmpt to deveiop “ <br />to the development of the proposed coniingent planned for road, represented by <br />l.. <br />to the road proposed.0 IVttU <br />.0 evaluate dm <br />im”:iirf^:Sp-» <br />Um developer to open a road ov«.U)t2- Jg ^°LThi:i“ would k UomTOMa ! <br />Aereement that the -successora and H j.. ..litas^arnTdie <br />the terms of 'he Aarecmwi. Second, ^ __ - ^ ,p whether <br />Atrecmem. u *» iwv»-w«v ---------------- j Fy______ s^jgniitM. me ^liy wool- <br />disllable Apec. of simply <br />opening a previously platted road. <br />Outlot D <br />on Lot 1 <br />thou <br />{ a previously piaucu *v»u. <br />I realiie that platUn*a road '* *" <br />would be .0 <br />place <br />lot D. has the undesirable impact of the road, even <br />.011. One possible scenario for you^conslderau^ ^ <br />igh it is undesirable, and then to note in our . A.g -q-^j jg^cssAgreement and the planned Outlot A as the more desirable road access. <br />though it is undesirable, and then to note in our <br />IbrAgrcemcni and the planned Outlot A as the more desirable road access. <br />Mike, this memo sets out my concerns. Please call to discuss. <br />0lMM6Wi6 lOfl3/94