My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
10-24-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 11:57:13 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 11:53:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A. <br />B. <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />F. <br />Applicants were granted a conditional use permit for church use in 1970 <br />on this 1.3 acre property. A church building and parking lot were <br />subsequently constructed. <br />In 1970 a parking lot was proposed to include 52 parking stalls to meet <br />the City requirement for 1 stall per 4 persons based on a 200 person <br />capacity building. That parking lot was constructed somewhat smaller <br />than the proposed plan. <br />Church use has expanded to a level where parking overflows onto Togo <br />Road which is extremely narrow and not suited for parking. <br />The proposed parking lot expansion will add approximately 4,850 s.f. of <br />parking area which will accomodate at least 13 additional vehicles if <br />properly striped. <br />The proposed parking lot expansion increases hardcover on the property <br />from 35% to 43%, where only 35% would be allowed in the 500-1,000 ’ <br />hardcover setback zone. <br />The parking lot will add to the runoff accumulation from the 30 acre <br />watershed upstream from a deteriorated drain tile on the adjacent <br />property. Per the City Engineer ’s recommendation, it would be <br />appropriate that the applicants improve drainage by construction of a <br />swale or culvert along applicants’ east property line to alleviate the <br />potential for flooding of the adjacent property. <br />Applicants applied for and were granted a building permit for a lO’xll <br />coat room addition and 14’xl8 ’ carport in December 1993. The <br />inspections department erroneously did not call out the need for a <br />conditional use permit, which nonnally would be required for such <br />additions to a church in a residential zone. <br />Those additions were constructed and the carport was constructed to <br />extend 22’ east from the existing church building rather than the 14’ <br />approved plan, and therefore extended to a point 47 from the east <br />property line where a 50’ setback would normally be required for a <br />church structure existing as a conditional use permit in a residential zone. <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />. . , A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.