10-10-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

b. The structure could be placed on property meeting the required 75* setback from all lot lines. c If structure was to be placed in a conforming location on the higher elevations to the north and west, tower would have greater visual impact on the adjacent residential property. d. The owner of the property and the adjacent property owner ^ve agree J to execute agreements that would release the City from all liabilitiw should the structure in its present nonconforming location collapse and result in property damage. 4 The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this ptopeity m to it and do not apply generally to other property in this loning grantin! the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor Lse a fire hazard or other danger to neighhonng propeiltes; would not merely S^^e as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to »"=v»te a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary top«se™ a right of the applicant; and would be in keepuig with the spirit and mtem of tin Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5 The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit ^ an^ima/tower stnicture to remain in its present location will not be det^en-a to the health safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect pose a fire hazard or other danger to ^ighboring will its use depreciate surrounding property values ^ ***"**“. use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the 7 Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orotio City Council hereby grants a cotidition.al use permit and a variance to Municipal ^mng S^tton^0j!^8j Subdivision 3 (A) use permit for an independent riC^i^r'Srulreri' a:r— Light of 75-, subject to the following conditions; Page 2 of 5