Laserfiche WebLink
*/APlanning Commission Memberslanning & Zoning Administrator/Engen & Kozojed & Associates, Inc., 15 Orono - Public Hearing <br />esidential Two Acre <br />'jt. Proposal is to remove existing house and <br />t is unlawful to convert, enlarge, reconstruct or <br />»r land for any purpose or in any manner which <br />apter. <br />width in the RR-IB zone is 200’ as measured <br />,D <br />Zoning File #1963 September 14, 1994 Page 2kv »: f <br />Applicants propose to remove the existi*^ house and construct a new residence. In their <br />initial attempts to incorporate the existing house into the project, they concluded after discussions <br />with suff that rather than request side setback variances to expand the existing house located <br />about 20’ frmn the Luce Line, it would be more prudent to start from scratch. <br />The lot is triangular shaped and only 50* wide where it abuts Orono Orchard Road. At <br />the 50’ front setback line, the width is 80’. The functional width at the house and garage ranges <br />from 110-150’, and the 30’ side setbacks for the RR-IB zone can easily be met. Since the <br />existing residence to the northwest is 400’ + disunt, and there is no adjacent residence to the <br />south, the narrow nature of the lot has little impact. The fact that the new house will be further <br />back where the lot is wider is a positive improvement. <br />andF <br />Please review the applicant’s description of request and hardship statement, Exhibits E <br />Options for Actk <br />Recommend approval as proposed. <br />Recommend approval with conditions. <br />Table, requesting additional information <br />Recommend denial. <br />5.Other.