My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
09-26-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 11:15:47 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 11:12:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VO.S ^ Zoning Administrator <br />lal Bay Road - Variance - Public Hearing <br />back, lakesbore setback, average lakesbore <br />sment of a deck and railing above the existing <br />5, Subd. 8; Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C) and <br />ihall be located closer to the lakeshote than <br />le of existing residence buildings on adjacent <br />:k to be leplaced extend lakewaid of the <br />tures by approximately 12 ’). <br />\ Minnetonka is 75’ (existing garage and a <br />>xiniately 65’ from the shoreline). <br />Zone is 10 ’ (existing garage and deck to be <br />ne). <br />75^ lakesbore setback zone (no variance <br />existing structural hardcover - there will no <br />lie deck replacement). <br />Zoning File #1961 Sep temb er 15. 1994 <br />Page2 <br />repl acement (rf* the stairway and access to the ftont doors of the house but deck and railing <br />replacement has not proceoJed. <br />Thtt deck b above an existing block garage located approximately 65’ from the shoreline and <br />7.3* from the side lot line. Replacement of the deck will not increase hardcover on the <br />prop erty, but. as in many other lakesbore deck replacements, is located in the 0-75’ lakeshote <br />setback zone where any deck reidacement, even when replaced exactly in kind, requites a <br />The deck constitutes an encroachment of approximately 10 ’ into the average lakeshote setback, <br />but will be no more of an encroachment than has existed at this location for 45 years. Neither <br />neighbor has commented negatively regarding this deck replacement. <br />Hardridps <br />Applicant has noted that the deck has existed for many years, and will not constitute new <br />oT additional hardcover. The deck deteriorated similar to many other decks in <br />the City cotmrvcted prior to the availability of treated lumber. <br />Note that while this is an extremely small lot and hardcover percentages are in excess of 60% ^ <br />in each zone, there is little or no hardcover which could be removed without reducing the degrer^ <br />of useability of the property. v <br />OptioBS for Actioa <br />1. Recommend approval as proposed per the applicam ’s noted hardships. ^ ^ <br />Recommend conditional approval (state conditions). <br />Recommend denial (state reasons). <br />Table for more information. <br />aged deck flooring and railing which had <br />work without a permit and the job was <br />IS. Currently, the inspector has allowed <br />5.Other <br />Note: At applicant ’s request, this item will be placed on the Council s September 26th agenda <br />for final action. <br />O
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.