Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />minutes of the ohono planning CO <br />HELD AUGUST 15, 19M <br />.T Iv^ I L*N MEETING <br />m »vm GLEN WTON, ms NOKTH SHORE DRIVE • VARIANCES - PUBUC <br />hearing - S:4t TO 8:55 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of PuWicatioii and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Glen Upton was present. <br />rmffwan csfiUiMd aoDlicant proposes a room addition and attached garage to the existing h^Tl* e»o«i.» IA«hoc« irtbick for tte hOM«e o ^ <br />SrZ? HI i»oi»«d M 4r iii4 iTO|»sed deck Heidcover is » con«*fn wiihm <br />te 0-W’ "*-* exinii* beS|Mn.8» sod Uk proposal would increase « to <br />« 7« N^tal^avet wiU be a«M to fte 7I-230’ area which is now al 0». Lor coverage Iv <br />JSllLs *toe 15* is altowed and 1.876 s.f. or 22.3* » <br />fmooed He poinled our lhat code allows any lor to have up to 1,500 s.f. of lot coverage^ <br />SS so^'TtXe b no. from 15* bur ftom 1.500 s.f. Actually i. arnourns to a 376 <br />S.f. variance. No side or street setback variances are necessary. <br />lindoubrinouired if the vacated county road was par. of ttw property. Gaffton said i. w an <br />fT^S^y pnrpoees serving neighboring properrte. and Uto e^ <br />credited toward lot area. <br />Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. <br />If^SJ-to^propesD because i. was located within .he 0-75-se*^ Hecommentod <br />everyotte should be treated the same. <br />I iaMtdy«i«t felt the proposed improvement is too ambitious for the lot. Chair Schroeder also <br />agreed that the lot caimot take additional hardcover. <br />asked if he could receive credit for the land across roM. Peiers<» »P**^ <br />Upton whh™M <br />Planning Cotnnussion wUI not allow him to improve his property. <br />GlenU <br />there <br />• 1 <br />1. was moved by Pmernrn. second*, by &l»o^ “ <br />&b^Slto J2SS w^^SdSr^^'on r’:i0- counca agenda for the Septomber 12. <br />1994 meeting. <br />8