Laserfiche WebLink
• • • rjn ■Wiii^j^s^’vr.-^xsrna r jxir-s * k-jrz <br />i U <br />J <br />Request for Council Action continuedpage 4 of 5 <br />September 6, 1994 <br />Zoning File #1941 __________________________ <br />a 3’ wide catwalk or balcony along the perimeter of the three season porch ^ at the m^er <br />bedroom for safety reasons as bedroom was constructed with patio doors. A building permit <br />as it was argued the City had approved patio doors at ^ upper level and the <br />balcony was needed for safety reasons and included with the onginal 1982 permit. <br />Review Exhibits M. N and O. in 1985. survey shows im existing ^'loym^ <br />u »ai thsat to the inlet or protected lagoon area. Review Exhibit F, note the 1971/ly i <br />dredged prior to 1960. <br />Pvhihits G and H in 1986. the same owner who insulled the upper level connetting <br />* » H/iirirtn Review Exhibit M note that the channel received more permanentwo story aMitm^ fev^E b^ ^ ^ ^ ^ <br />Sgirf^in pro' Ki«K navigable waters for boats stored at the shoreline of the pond. <br />Statement of HardsiUps, Review Exhibit B <br />Hardships are reviewed as follows: <br />1. The applicants note that 80% of the total property is unbuildable. <br />I ^ etas, rtrnivartv in 1973 orior to current lakeshore setback2. The house was placed on the property in <br />standards. <br />3. The majority of the house is located within the 0-75’ setback area. <br />Planning Commission Recommendations <br />Planning Commission worked hard with ^ of <br />the lagoon and held stiuctural improvements to existing setbacx aitnoug