My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:51:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
52.costs recovered through user fees, 25% would you attempt to recover less 50% - 75% <br />than twenty-five percent, t%renty- <br />five percent to fifty percent, <br />fifty to seventy-five percent, <br />seventy-five percent to one-hun- <br /><ix‘ed percent, or more than one - <br />hundred percent of the costs? <br />less than 25%. ....17%25% - 50%. . . . . ....26%50% - 75%. . . . . ....13%75% - 100%. . . . . <br />. . .11% <br />OVER 100%. . . . . . <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. . .28% <br />iLet’s talk about pedestrian and bicycle trails- - <br />S3.Would you favor or oppose a trail <br />system linking parks and recrea <br />tional facilities within the com <br />munity? (IF -FAVOR," ASK:) Would <br />you still favor it if a property <br />tax increase were required to de <br />velop the system? <br />FAVOR/STILL FAVOR. . .36% <br />FAVOR/NO. . . . . . . . .22% <br />FAVOR/UNSURE. . . . . . .12% <br />OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . .26% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .5% <br />54.If a citywide trail system were <br />built, should it primarily serve <br />pedestrians, primarily serve bicy <br />clists, or serve both? <br />PRIMARY PEDESTRIANS- -6% <br />PRIMARY BICYCLISTS. . .3% <br />both. . . . . . . . . .®7% <br />DON’T KNOW/REFUSED. . .4% <br />The City of Orono's current trail system plan calls for trails <br />adjacent to the City's major local roadways. <br />V\A oif'inrT **-countiTV, Similar to tne Liuceadjacent to tne cicy s majui. <br />trails would be siting them -cross-country, similar to the Luce <br />Line Trail. <br />55. Would you favor or oppose addi <br />tional trails going -cross-coun <br />try- similar to the Luce Line? <br />(WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel <br />strongly that way? <br />STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . .25% <br />FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . .32% <br />OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . .22% <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . .10% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED- -11% <br />IF -STRONGLY FAVOR- OR -FAVOR,- ASK: <br />56.Would you still support it <br />if a property tax increase <br />were required to develop <br />these trails? <br />YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />NO. . . . . . . . . . . . .32% <br />DON’T KNOW/REFUSED. .4% <br />57.Would you still favor it if YES. . . . . . . . . . . . .74% <br />the trail were to run by your NO. . . . ... . . . . . . <br />property? DON' T KNOW/REFUSED. . .7% <br />Moving on.. <br />58. In general, how would you rate the EXCELLENT <br />maintenance of Orono Park and rec- GOOD <br />reation facilities -- excellent, <br />good, only fair, or poor? <br />19% <br />54% <br />ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . .12% <br />POOR. . . . . . . . . . . .3% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....13% <br />• <br />2TZ___J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.