My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:51:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IF "NO," ASK; <br />34. What additional parks and recreational facilities would <br />you like to see offered residents? <br />NO ANSWER, 6%; MORE TRAILS, 20%; ICE ARENA, 7%; <br />BALLFIELDS, 10%; PLAY EQUIPMENT, 20%; TENNIS COURTS, <br />6%; BUY OPEN SPACE, 3%; MORE PARKS, 20%; OTHER, 10%; <br />35.Do you feel the City of Orono <br />should develop a more extensive <br />park system or do you feel that <br />current facilities are adequate <br />for city residents? <br />SHOULD DEVELOP. . . . .26% <br />ARE ADEQUATE. . . . . .66% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .8% <br />The City could undertake a number of park and recreational devel <br />opment efforts. <br />36. Which of the following would you PRIORITY A. . . . . . . .42% <br />make the chief priority of the PRIORITY B. . . . . . . .13% <br />City of Orono_ _ (ROTATE) PRIORITY C. . . . . . . .23% <br />A. Preserving more natural land SOMETHING ELSE (VOL)...l% <br />areas, such as wetlands, see- ALL OF ABOVE (VOL)....15% <br />nic open spaces, and wildlife NONE OF ABOVE (VOL)_ _6% <br />habitats; DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . .1% <br />B. Developing additional active <br />park facilities, such as ball <br />fields and playgrounds; <br />C. Developing additional passive <br />park facilities, such as walk <br />ing trails and flower gardens. <br />The preservation of open space or the development of parks and <br />recreational facilities by the City of Orono would probably <br />require a property tax increase. Suppose the City were to pro <br />pose parks and recreational development efforts along the lines <br />we have been discussing.... <br />37. How much would you be willing to NOTHING. . . . . . . . . .36% <br />see your yearly property taxes $30.00. . . . . . . . . .19% <br />increase to fund the parks and $60.00. . . . . . . . . .11% <br />recreational development efforts? $90.00. . . . . . . . . . .0% <br />Let's say, would you be willing to $120.00. . . . . . . . . .5% <br />see your yearly taxes increased by $150.00. . . . . . . . . .1% <br />$_ _? (CHOOSE RANDOM STARTING $180.00. . . . . . . . . .5% <br />POINT; MOVE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING DON'T KNOW. . . . . . . .13% <br />ON ANSWER) How about $ per REFUSED. . . . . . . . . .3% <br />year? (REPEAT PROCESS) <br />I would like to read you a list of park and recreation facilities <br />which could become part of a City of Orono Park System. In order <br />to fund the acquisition of land and the development of any facil <br />ities, though, an increase in property taxes would be required. <br />For each one, please tell me if you would strongly support, <br />somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose a moderate <br />'r ' ■ <br />^ ^
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.