Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST roil COUNCIL ACTION ^ " <^)o • <br />DATE <br />ITEM NO <br />Dcpartmoit Approval: <br />Nmw Mkhad P. Gaffioa <br />TMe Aas. PUmiiaf A Zootiif A <br />Afcnda Scctii <br />Zoning <br />ismor <br />I • I t Dt irriplhw* B-2 Zoning District Aiiiei <br />1 At of ExhiMtl <br />A - Proposed Arocndmeni <br />B - Staff Memo 5/31/94 <br />C - Kevin Staunton Memo 7/22/94 <br />in the «taSS oriinmee recommendation <br />process resulting in thb proposed ordinance is provided m Exhibit B, and m the 1 thick blue <br />covered document compilation which Council received earlier this summer. <br />^gfulatlon of Operation (Uscsl <br />The proposed ordinal <br />should be reeulated. The majority or recommcnuca enauges uu m ---------------7^ V.,:" <br />property ratteThan the physical aspects of the propel^. Plann^ <br />re -Xing the lot a«a/wHlth/set^lt/ha«lcoverre .xine the lot arca/wiatn/seioacx/naiutuvci auiuuaa%.ta --------— <br />marinas was not appropriate. Planning Commission did suggest that those mannas^uesiing <br />a conditional use iSfor a use which they have not had in the past should be required to meet <br />the landscaping requirements <br />ssjss rsj'.sc.s rii pw..««».«- ~ <br />^ denial of licenses when that did no. occur, but uktng no legal action nor <br />imposing sanctions for noncompliance. <br />•iW. ywv • . 11X4^01 <br />re .*.■ <br />•• •• <br />smthmuiii iJCsJlttWitfhriau