09-12-1994 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

formula for determining the number of ixhibit G, specifically pages 6 and 7 lex residences shall be assigned one unit arged a sewer and water unit for each of In the Navarro Planned Residential d a single sewer and water unit. on adopted by the City that dealt with an It’s attorney shall receive a copy of that ler assessment rolls for sewer and water I SAC charge the City had no foiroula for jperty was assessed one residential sewer Tie City was asked to recognize the legal t land use application review called for a [uest based on the unusual circumstances las not required payment of a SAC charge 1 prior to 1974. d by May 15, 1994. The improvements e paving of the one off-street parking stall, le Mrs. McKinney ’s ill health and the need )vements were completed some time in the ner of August 9. 1994, Exhibit E-6, new : 1st. Shawn Gustafson completed his final jorts that all required improvements have satisfied with the restoration of the entire Resolution #3370 r and water units for the second residential •e required off-street parking stalls. As her in the second garage stall during the penod preparing the unit for future rent. Since iquipment/fumiture within the garage stall. 5 M i ( Request for Council Action continued page 4 of 5 September 8, 1994 Zoning File #1860 Review Exhibit D-2, Lyle Oman’s letter to Ms. Siegler, advises her of the need to provide legal egress windows from the lower level bedroom. The applicant was advised of this code violation upon a site inspection of the facility on September 9, 1993 and in a staff memo dated September 16, 1993. Staff has asked for the immediate installation of legal ingress windows from bedroom or to discontinue use of the room. Review Exhibit E-2, Ms. Siegler has noted financial limitations will prevent her from making necessary corrections at this time. Oman will ask for a written statement reaffirming that the lower level bedroom will not be used until egress windows are established. General Comments Ms. Siegler’s letters advise the conditions of the approval permit are too restrictive and have made the property difficult to sell. In reviewing Exhibits D and E, Council can attest to the many exchanges between both applicant and City staff. This does not reflect the many calls the City receives from adjacent property owners. Staff has devoted far too much time to this single property dealing with either complaints or special requests of the applicant. Issues for CounciFs Consideration Applicant asks Council to reconsider requirement to make payment for an additional sewer and water unit for the second dwelling unit. Applicant notes the multiple dwelling use had existed at the time of the original sewer and water projects and there have been no changes in that use nor in the installation of new water use fixtures. It has also been noted that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has not required a payment of a SAC charge because the use was in existence prior to 1974. This is not the policy of the City. It was the City ’s position during the review of Zelma McKinney ’s conditional use permit application that the existing non- conforming use was now recognized as a legal use the first time in the City ’s records. Similar to the property on Shady wood Road referenced above where the City approved a duplex use of the property and in reviewing the sewer and water assessments found that two residential sewer and water units had been assessed against the property and additional payments were not necessary. Council Action To either reaffirm the original condition that requires payment of a separate sewer and water unit or to accept applicant’s request to not require payment. -