My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
09-12-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:56:33 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:51:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />h#- <br />■^n <br />To:Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />August 4, 1994 <br />#1954 Lawrence D. Elsen, 2879 Casco Point Road - Variance - Public Hearing <br />Pertinent Ordinance <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (D) - Lakeshore setback variance required for privacy fence. <br />Required = 75’ <br />Proposed = 5’ <br />Variance = 70’ or 93% <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - <br />B - <br />C - <br />D - <br />E - <br />F <br />G - <br />H - <br />Application <br />Applicant’s Addendum <br />Property Owners’ List <br />Plat Map <br />Neighbors’ Acknowledgement Forms <br />Resolution No. 3303 <br />Approved Site Plan for Application #1833 <br />Survey <br />Description of Request <br />In July of 1993. Ihe applicant received approval of multiple variances to allow a in^or <br />garage addition and other structural additions to the lakeside of the residence. APPltcant wa. <br />Sted to remove a 20’ x 8> 4' shed at the lakeside of his property, because of <br />««ssis Tn the process of removing the shed, the existing privacy fencing along he <br />wXblic access sL of the property was expo^ and ^7^'° <br />condition. Applicant replaced fencing without a building permit and has reinstalled <br />plantings on both sides of privacy tence. <br />Review Exhibit E, many of the adjacent neighbors <br />former fencing because of its dilapidated condition and potential for collapse. <br />D r .r. Pvhihit H hatch marks alone the west lot line locate the privacy fencing that <br />had existed on the proper.;. The new fence is <br />r" Soumg“unVrof .Pe PubHc access from nespassing into <br />their property. The former shed had ser%ed this purpose in the past.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.