Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Goecificaricr.s, wnich rate the tower secure ir. eichty-nile-per-hour <br />winds. Although the city generally relies cn such specifications <br />produced by manufacturers, it declined to do so in this case. In <br />addition, the tower was retractable, and the city could require <br />Pentel to retract it whenever bad weather threatened. .Moreover, <br />t.he citv i.n 1987 allowed a .nearby amateur radio operator to erect <br />a similar tower, and that one was closer to the operator's property <br />line than Pentel's was to be. The record before us thus does not <br />establish a factual basis for the city's safety concerns. <br />Third, the city claims that it believed it reasonably <br />accommodated Pentel because she already successfully engages in <br />amateur ccm-.unications. Pentel submitted with her application a <br />letter of commendation for her public ser'/ices. The city's <br />olanninc reoort concluded that this letter demonstrated the <br />adequacy of Pentel's current antenna. Pentel has pointed out, <br />.however, that the public services cited in the letter were not <br />related to the amateur communications in which she engaged from her <br />hcm.e. In fact, the letter m.akes it clear that the amateur <br />communications for which Pentel was to be commended were conducted <br />at the Air National Guard base in Minneapolis. <br />In addition, the mayor and some membiers of the city council <br />indicated in their depositions that they concluded from. Pentel's <br />statem.ents at the heari.ngs t.hat she already was communicating <br />effectively, albeit not to the extent she desired. The heari.ngs' <br />m.inutes indicate that Pentel stated that she was able to reac.h only <br />sporadically various places in the United States, and that her <br />curre.nt antenna did not allow reliable long-range transmissions. <br />Vvhe.n prom.pted, her attorney reluctantly attempted to quantify the <br />communications: he characterized Pentel's current c.hances for <br />m.aki.ng co.ntact at 4 0 percent, and estimated those chances at 80 to <br />90 percent with the improved tower. The context of these remarks <br />and Pentel's ot.her statements 'indicate that these chances of <br />success referred to domestic communications only. <br />-3-