My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-1994 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1994
>
08-22-1994 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2023 10:22:30 AM
Creation date
12/11/2023 10:19:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Peri tel is 3n anateur radio operator vho uses radio <br />ccrnunications to ser/e the public interest. After she vas <br />licensed by t.he FCC in December 1938 to operate an anateur radio <br />and a station from her hone, she installed on her roof a vertical <br />radio antenna that reaches a hei-^’ht iron the ground of 56.5 feet. <br />next two '^ears, Pentel was unable to establish relia.^le <br />radio ccinnunications with other amateurs across the United States, <br />and she was able to establish only one international contact. <br />Pentel concluded that her existing antenna thus was not adequate <br />for domestic, much less international, communications. <br />Accordingly, Pentel began preparing to install a more <br />sophisticated antenna. The replacement was to be a retractable <br />steel tower t.hat measured 30 feet when lowered and 63 feet when <br />fully extended. This tower, which Pentel planned to have installed <br />orofessionallv in accordance with its manuracturer's <br />soecifications, was to .have mounted on its top two directional <br />aluminum antennas. <br />Pentel was unaware when she installed her original antenna <br />that she was violating t.he city^s zoning ordinance, which limits <br />all structures, including radio antennas, to a height or twen^j— <br />’pentel's proposed antenna would be more effective than her <br />existing set-up for two reasons. First, Pentel's current vertical <br />antenna dissipates signals in all directions, while her proposed <br />directional antenna would concentrate and collect signals, thus <br />increasing her ability to transmit and receive in a specific <br />direction. Second, an antenna^s effectiveness increases with its <br />height. Pentel's existing antenna is blocked by trees. Her tal-er <br />replacement antenna, when extended, would be at or near the tops or <br />nearby trees, thus i.mprov'ing her signal transmission and reception. <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.