Laserfiche WebLink
small antennas is that they present less surtace area to <br />passing radio waves, and are therefore less effective m <br />picking up incoming signals. This effect is termed pickup <br />efficiency. Pickup efficiency is reciprocative; it applies, <br />to transmitted sig-als as well as to received signals. To <br />obtain higher pickup efficiency and therefore greater <br />communications effectiveness, many antenna elements <br />are required at VHP and UHF. The elements are usually <br />installed on multiple booms. Single, vertical radiators, <br />even at elevated heights, are ineffective for distances <br />beyond a few miles at these frequency ranges This is <br />true because of low pickup efficiency and because of the <br />omnidirectional characteristic of the radiator. Stacked <br />vertical radiators are sometimes used to obtain gam with <br />omnidirectional coverage. <br />Although ionospheric propagation does sometimes <br />occur at the lower end of the VHP range, propagation <br />at too MHz and above is almost always over a line-of- <br />sight path Under usual conditions, signals at these <br />frequencies encounter very little refraction in air. There­ <br />fore it behooves a person using these frequencies to <br />place his antenna as high as possible, so it can see <br />farther Certainly the antenna must be above sur ­ <br />rounding objects, such as dense foliage and man-made <br />structures Such objects absorb radio-frequency energy <br />in this portion of the spectrum, and therefore tend to <br />block the signal from propagating Objects such as hills, <br />steel structures and many commercial or industrial <br />buildings will block VHP signals to an even greater <br />degree" creating ••shadows" behind them. <br />At VHP and UHP. the lowest lobes for Yagi arrays <br />at 35 and 70 feet are only a few degrees above the <br />horizontal. However, for line-of-sight communications, <br />the radiation angle should be zero, if possible., unless <br />one wishes to communicate with airplanes or objects in <br />outer space. Even more desirable are negative angles <br />from high locations, so the antenna can ••look down on <br />the te. iin At VHP and UHP the radiation angles for <br />35-fr 3t heights are twice those occurring for the 70-foot <br />heights. Therefore at VHP it is also beneficial to place <br />the antenna as high as possible, and m the clear from <br />surrounding objects. <br />Amateur Radio operators wishing to contact other <br />amateurs at great distances use a time-worn but true <br />expression, •‘"por the best results, put your antenna as <br />high as you possibly can.’’ Many amateurs in various <br />parts of the world put their big antennas atop 120-foot <br />towers, and enjoy communications with amateurs in <br />foreign countries when neighboring amateurs with much <br />lower antennas cannot even hear the foreign signals. <br />Conclusion <br />The preceding information has dealt with antenna <br />height and communications effectiveness It has been <br />shown that for all amateur frequencies, high horizontal <br />antennas will outperform low antennas. Information has <br />been developed to show a consistent power gam of the <br />hiqher antennas over low ones, that is. at 70 feet and <br />35 feet. The 70-foot height was chosen only for the <br />purpose of illustration, and is not intended to be <br />construed as the optimum height for antennas. Heights <br />above 100 feet will give significantly better performance <br />than at 70 feet. <br />It is reasonable to assume that if an amateur <br />operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, he will <br />obtain transmitting equipment with a corresponding <br />increase in power output to compensate for the loss of <br />antenna ehectiveness. Por example, he might increase <br />his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1 .5 kilowatts to <br />compensate for a three-fold loss in antenna effectiveness <br />because of height limitations. It should be realized that <br />this increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities <br />for his stronger signal to overload nearby television and <br />radio receivers, creating interference tor viewers and <br />listeners. <br />There is one further consideration concerning <br />.amateur antenna height with regard to television and <br />radio interference. In essence, the sole source of <br />radiated PP energy from an Amateur Radio station is its <br />antenna. Ra sing that antenna to an increased height, <br />far above *he level of existing antennas for television <br />reception, will reduce the possibility of interference to <br />television reception from fundamental overload.